Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14990676›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2004

Activation of single heteromeric GABA(A) receptor ion channels by full and partial agonists.

Martin Mortensen, Uffe Kristiansen, Bjarke Ebert, Bente Frølund, Povl Krogsgaard-Larsen, Trevor G Smart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. GABAJournal of neurochemistry · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Direct Structural Insights into GABATrends in biochemical sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Probing GABANeuropharmacology · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Loop G in the GABAThe Journal of physiology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Context-Dependent Modulation of GABAAR-Mediated Tonic Currents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. α1F64 Residue at GABA(A) receptor binding site is involved in gating by influencing the receptor flipping transitions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin MortensenDepartment of Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Uffe Kristiansen
Bjarke Ebert
Bente Frølund
Povl Krogsgaard-Larsen
Trevor G Smart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The linkage between agonist binding and the activation of a GABA(A) receptor ion channel is yet to be resolved. This aspect was examined on human recombinant alpha1beta2gamma2S GABA(A) receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney cells using the following series of receptor agonists: GABA, isoguvacine, 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP), isonipecotic acid, piperidine-4-sulphonic acid (P4S), imidazole-4-acetic acid (IAA), 5-(4-piperidyl)-3-isothiazolol (thio-4-PIOL) and 5-(4-piperidyl)-3-isoxazolol (4-PIOL). Whole-cell concentration-response curves enabled the agonists to be categorized into four classes based upon their maximum responses. Single channel analyses revealed that the channel conductance of 25-27 pS was unaffected by the agonists. However, two open states were resolved from the open period distributions with mean open times reduced 5-fold by the weakest partial agonists. Using saturating agonist concentrations, estimates of the channel shutting rate, alpha, ranged from 200 to 600 s(-1). The shut period distributions were described by three or four components and for the weakest partial agonists, the interburst shut periods increased whilst the mean burst durations and longest burst lengths were reduced relative to the full agonists. From the burst analyses, the opening rates for channel activation, beta, and the total dissociation rates, k(-1), for the agonists leaving the receptor were estimated. The agonist efficacies were larger for the full agonists (E approximately 7-9) compared to the weak partial agonists ( approximately 0.4-0.6). Overall, changes in agonist efficacy largely determined the different agonist profiles with contributions from the agonist affinities and the degree of receptor desensitization. From this we conclude that GABA(A) receptor activation does not occur in a switch-like manner since the agonist recognition sites are flexible, accommodating diverse agonist structures which differentially influence the opening and shutting rates of the ion channel.

Indexed as

GABA-A Receptor AgonistsCells, CulturedDNA, ComplementaryEmbryo, MammalianGABA AgonistsHumansIon Channel GatingIon ChannelsKineticsPatch-Clamp TechniquesReceptors, GABA-ATransfectionDNA, ComplementaryGABA AgonistsGABA-A Receptor AgonistsIon ChannelsReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID14990676
PMCPMC1665090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.