ArticleBiophysical journal2004
Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
136 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Macrophages bend long fibres with flexural rigidity lower than 3 mN·nmParticle and fibre toxicology · 2026Article
- At the Pointy End of Mechanobiology: AFM for Transient Biomechanical Analysis.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Nanomechanical characterization of soft nanomaterial using atomic force microscopy.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Cancer cells impact the microrheology of endothelial cells during physical contact or through paracrine signalling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analytical methods in studying cell force sensing: principles, current technologies and perspectives.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Role of adhesion in the mechanics of pathogenic Listeria monocytogenes EGDe as a function of the pH of growth.Biointerphases · 2024Article
- Investigations of cardiac fibrosis rheology by in vitro cardiac tissue modeling with 3D cellular spheroids.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024Article
- Emergence of nanoscale viscoelasticity from single cancer cells to established tumors.Biomaterials · 2024Article
- Effect of non-linear strain stiffening in eDAH and unjamming.Soft matter · 2024Article
- Nanoscale Rheology: Dynamic Mechanical Analysis over a Broad and Continuous Frequency Range Using Photothermal Actuation Atomic Force Microscopy.Macromolecules · 2024Article
- Quantifying both viscoelasticity and surface tension: Why sharp tips overestimate cell stiffness.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Homeostasis, injury, and recovery dynamics at multiple scales in a self-organizing mouse intestinal crypt.eLife · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- Strain-dependent elastography of cancer cells reveals heterogeneity and stiffening due to attachment.Journal of biomechanics · 2023Article
- Viscoelasticity and Noise Properties Reveal the Formation of Biomemory in Cells.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021Article
- Rapid viscoelastic changes are a hallmark of early leukocyte activation.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Cell nucleus as a microrheological probe to study the rheology of the cytoskeleton.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Dopamine D1 receptor stimulates cathepsin K-dependent degradation and resorption of collagen I in lung fibroblasts.Journal of cell science · 2020Article
76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Viscoelasticity of the leading edge, i.e., the lamellipodium, of a cell is the key property for a deeper understanding of the active extension of a cell's leading edge. The fact that the lamellipodium of a cell is very thin (<1000 nm) imparts special challenges for accurate measurements of its viscoelastic behavior. It requires addressing strong substrate effects and comparatively high stresses (>1 kPa) on thin samples. We present the method for an atomic force microscopy-based microrheology that allows us to fully quantify the viscoelastic constants (elastic storage modulus, viscous loss modulus, and the Poisson ratio) of thin areas of a cell (<1000 nm) as well as those of thick areas. We account for substrate effects by applying two different models-a model for well-adhered regions (Chen model) and a model for nonadhered regions (Tu model). This method also provides detailed information about the adhered regions of a cell. The very thin regions relatively near the edge of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts can be identified by the Chen model as strongly adherent with an elastic strength of approximately 1.6 +/- 0.2 kPa and with an experimentally determined Poisson ratio of approximately 0.4 to 0.5. Further from the edge of these cells, the adherence decreases, and the Tu model is effective in evaluating its elastic strength ( approximately 0.6 +/- 0.1 kPa). Thus, our AFM-based microrheology allows us to correlate two key parameters of cell motility by relating elastic strength and the Poisson ratio to the adhesive state of a cell. This frequency-dependent measurement allows for the decomposition of the elastic modulus into loss and storage modulus. Applying this decomposition and Tu's and Chen's finite depth models allow us to obtain viscoelastic signatures in a frequency range from 50 to 300 Hz, showing a rubber plateau-like behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.