Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14989404›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2003

The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neurodevelopmental perspective.

Barbara A Cornblatt, Todd Lencz, Christopher W Smith, Christoph U Correll, Andrea M Auther, Emilie Nakayama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 377 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Exploring causal mechanisms of psychosis risk.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara A CornblattAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. cornblat@lij.edu
Todd Lencz
Christopher W Smith
Christoph U Correll
Andrea M Auther
Emilie Nakayama
Schneider Children's Hospital · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

COURSE OF ILLNESS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: OPTIMIZING OUTCOMESP30MH060575 · NIMH · LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER · PI KANE, JOHN M · 2000 to 2004
$6.5M
CHARACTERIZATION OF PRODROMAL SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH061523 · NIMH · LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER · PI CORNBLATT, BARBARA A. · 2000 to 2009
$3.6M
BIOBEHAVIORAL INDICATORS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH050203 · NIMH · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF CUNY · PI CORNBLATT, BARBARA A. · 1995 to 1998
–
NIMH NIH HHS MH-50203NIMH NIH HHS MH-60575NIMH NIH HHS MH-61523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the widespread acceptance of the neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia, its application to research concerned with the prodromal phase of illness is limited. Little recognition has been given to the concept of an enduring biological vulnerability to illness that may be responsive to early intervention. Rather, the focus of most prodromal studies is on emerging positive symptoms. The Recognition and Prevention (RAP) program follows the strategy of being equally concerned with the nonspecific symptoms reflecting the core of schizophrenia and those directly related to psychosis. Data were collected from 62 adolescents (mean age = 16.4 years) during the initial 3-year pilot phase of the RAP program (1998-2001). Subjects were divided into three clinical high-risk groups, characterized by (1) negative and nonspecific symptoms (e.g., social isolation, school failures), the earliest prodrome stage; (2) emerging attenuated positive symptoms of moderate intensity; and (3) severe attenuated (but subpsychotic) positive symptoms, considered most proximal to psychosis. Four risk factors, derived from the neurodevelopmental literature, were selected to reflect the vulnerability core: cognitive deficits, affective disturbances, social isolation, and school failure. All four domains were equally impaired across the three risk groups, supporting the presence of the underlying vulnerability core regardless of the magnitude of emerging positive symptoms. An observational pilot study was also conducted to identify the medications typically used to treat emerging positive symptoms. Antidepressants were used as frequently as antipsychotics to treat adolescents presenting with moderate attenuated positive symptoms. Regardless of type of medication, moderately symptomatic youngsters did quite well over the approximately 1-year followup period. By contrast, adolescents presenting with more severe (but nonpsychotic) attenuated symptoms were treated with antipsychotics, often in combination with other agents. Outcome for the more symptomatic youngsters was, however, more guarded, with nearly half (i.e., 47%) of the group converting to a schizophrenia spectrum psychotic disorder. Nonadherence to medication appeared to be a major risk factor in this group. We conclude that a neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia is supported by our data and that a range of novel treatment strategies may be neuroprotective by directly affecting the disorder's vulnerability core.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAdolescentAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsDelusionsDepressive DisorderDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHallucinationsHumansMalePilot ProjectsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRisk FactorsSchizophreniaSchizotypal Personality DisorderAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID14989404
OpenAlexW2158929255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.