Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14988730›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2004

Ordered DNA release and target capture in RAG transposition.

Adam G W Matthews, Sheryl K Elkin, Marjorie A Oettinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Target capture during Mos1 transposition.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014
    Article
  3. RAG: a recombinase diversified.Nature immunology · 2009
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam G W MatthewsDepartment of Molecular Biology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Sheryl K Elkin
Marjorie A Oettinger

Funding

VDJ RECOMBINATION ACTIVATING GENES--FUNCTIONAL ANALYSISR01GM048026 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI OETTINGER, MARJORIE A · 1992 to 2009
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048026NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM48026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following V(D)J cleavage, the newly liberated DNA signal ends can be either fused together into a signal joint or used as donor DNA in RAG-mediated transposition. We find that both V(D)J cleavage and release of flanking coding DNA occur before the target capture step of transposition can proceed; no coding DNA is ever detected in the target capture complex. Separately from its role in V(D)J cleavage, the DDE motif of the RAG1/2 active site is specifically required for target DNA capture. The requirement for cleavage and release of coding DNA prior to either physical target binding or functional target commitment suggests that the RAG1/2 transposase contains a single binding site for non-RSS DNA that can accommodate either target DNA or coding DNA, but not both together. Perhaps the presence of coding DNA may aid in preventing transpositional resolution of V(D)J recombination intermediates.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticBinding SitesDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHeLa CellsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansNuclear ProteinsNucleic Acid ConformationDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsNuclear ProteinsRAG-1 proteinRAG2 protein, humanV(D)J recombination activating protein 2

Identifiers

PMID14988730
PMCPMC380985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.