ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004
Why do doctors use treatments that do not work?
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Doctors as patients: a systematic review of doctors' health access and the barriers they experience.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008Pooled it
- Sicily statement on evidence-based practice.BMC medical education · 2005Guideline
- The safety of antiepileptic drug withdrawal in patients with non-epileptic seizures.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2005Trial
- The early warning paradox.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The perspectives of clinical level medical students on animal-assisted therapy: a study in Ghana.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Article
- The psychosocial response to a terrorist attack at Manchester Arena, 2017: a process evaluation.BMC psychology · 2021Article
- Methylprednisolone in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: Is There Enough Evidence?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Individualized ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI treatment: it is time to stop using high FSH doses in predicted low responders.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Invited commentary-WHO Classification of Tumours: How should tumors be classified? Expert consensus, systematic reviews or both?International journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Inappropriate use of ritodrine hydrochloride for threatened preterm birth in Japan: a retrospective cohort study using a national inpatient database.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Reduction of routine radiographs in the follow-up of distal radius and ankle fractures: Barriers and facilitators perceived by orthopaedic trauma surgeons.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2019Article
- Review
- Addressing overuse in emergency medicine: evidence of a role for greater patient engagement.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2017Review
- Comparison of veterinary drugs and veterinary homeopathy: part 2.The Veterinary record · 2017Review
- Parents' Expectations and Experiences of Antibiotics for Acute Respiratory Infections in Primary Care.Annals of family medicine · 2017Article
- Article
- Developing a psychiatrist-patient relationship when both people are doctors: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Prescribing for personality disorder: qualitative study of interviews with general and forensic consultant psychiatrists.Psychiatric bulletin (2014) · 2014Article
- Exciting new ECMO technology awaits compelling scientific evidence for widespread use in adults with respiratory failure.Intensive care medicine · 2012Article
- Systematic reviews, systematic error and the acquisition of clinical knowledge.BMC medical research methodology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.