Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14986136›Full record

ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2004

Isolation and developmental expression of Xenopus FoxJ1 and FoxK1.

Barbara S Pohl, Walter Knöchel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Development genes and evolution, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Aquatic models of human ciliary diseases.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ocular forkhead transcription factors: seeing eye to eye.The International journal of developmental biology · 2009
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara S PohlDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Ulm, Albert Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Walter Knöchel
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

xFoxJ1 and xFoxK1, two novel members of the fork head/winged helix family of transcription factors in Xenopus, have been identified by sequence homology to their mammalian orthologues. We here report the complete amino acid sequences of xFoxJ1, its pseudo-allelic version xFoxJ1', and of xFoxK1, the latter also comprising a fork-head-associated (FHA) domain. We have further analysed the temporal and spatial expression of both genes. xFoxJ1 transcripts were detected during gastrulation in the dorsal blastopore lip and in the animal half. A predominant feature of xFoxJ1 expression until the tailbud stage is its spotty pattern within the epidermis. xFoxK1 is maternally expressed and localized within the animal half during early cleavage stages. Zygotic transcription starts during neurulation and is initially restricted to neuroectoderm. As development proceeds, xFoxK1 is expressed in ectoderm- and mesoderm-derived tissues, like the branchial arches, brain, eye, otic vesicle, pronephros, somites and abdominal muscle precursors.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ComplementaryForkhead Transcription FactorsGene ExpressionMolecular Sequence DataRNA, MessengerSequence AlignmentTrans-ActivatorsXenopus laevisXenopus ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ComplementaryForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXJ1 protein, XenopusFOXK1 protein, XenopusRNA, MessengerTrans-ActivatorsXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID14986136
OpenAlexW1974222239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.