Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14985929›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2004

The role of dopamine D3 compared with D2 receptors in the control of locomotor activity: a combined behavioural and neurochemical analysis with novel, selective antagonists in rats.

Mark J Millan, Laetitia Seguin, Alain Gobert, Didier Cussac, Mauricette Brocco

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Arrestin-3 Agonism at Dopamine DBiological psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Identification ofeLife · 2020
    Article
  7. Targeting Dopamine DThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark J MillanPsychopharmacology Department, Institut de Recherches Servier, Centre de Recherches de Croissy, 125 chemin de Ronde, 78290 Croissy/Seine, Paris, France. mark.millan@fr.netgrs.com
Laetitia Seguin
Alain Gobert
Didier Cussac
Mauricette Brocco
AVL (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of dopamine D(3)/D(2) receptors in the control of locomotion is poorly understood.

objectivesTo examine the influence of selective antagonists at D(3) or D(2) receptors on locomotion in rats, alone and in interaction with the preferential D(3) versus D(2) receptor agonist, PD128,907.

methodsAffinities of ligands at rat D(2) and cloned, human hD(3), hD(2S), hD(2L) and hD(4) sites were determined by standard procedures. Locomotion was monitored automatically in rats pre-habituated for 30 min to an open-field environment. Extracellular levels of dopamine (DA) were determined by dialysis in the nucleus accumbens and striatum. Drugs were given acutely via the systemic route.

resultsPD128,907, which preferentially recognised D(3) versus D(2) sites, biphasically reduced and enhanced locomotion at "low" (0.01-0.63 mg/kg) and "high" (2.5-10 mg/kg) doses, respectively. L741,626 and S23199, which behaved as preferential D(2) versus D(3) receptor antagonists, enhanced the reduction in locomotion evoked by the low dose of PD128,907, blocked the increase provoked by the high dose and suppressed spontaneous locomotion alone. Analogous findings were obtained with haloperidol and raclopride which showed equilibrated affinity at D(2) and D(3) receptors. UH232 and AJ76, which showed a mild preference for D(3) versus D(2) sites, did not modify the effect of a low dose of PD128,907, slightly enhanced the hyperlocomotion elicited by the high dose and exerted little influence on locomotion alone. S14297 and U99194, which acted as preferential D(3) versus D(2) receptor antagonists, abolished the reduction in locomotion elicited by a low dose of PD128,907, potentiated the induction of locomotion by a high dose, and failed to influence locomotion alone. The actions of S14297 were stereoselective inasmuch as they were mimicked by the racemic form, S11566, but not by the inactive enantiomer, S17777. In contrast to S14297, S11566 and U99194, however, S33084, SB269,652, GR218,231 and N-[-4-['-(1-naphtyl)piperazine-1-yl]butyl] anthracene-2-carboxamide ("NGB-1"), highly selective D(3) versus D(2) receptor antagonists, were inactive under all conditions. PD128,907 (0.01-10.0 mg/kg) suppressed dialysate levels of DA in the nucleus accumbens and striatum, actions blocked by L741,626 and haloperidol, yet unaffected by S14297 and S33084.

conclusionsThe facilitatory influence of a "high" dose of PD128,907 upon locomotion is mediated by postsynaptic D(2) receptors and, possibly, countered by their D(3) counterparts. Correspondingly, selective blockade of D(2) but not of D(3) receptors alone suppresses motor function. The reduction in locomotion provoked by a "low" dose of PD128,907 may be mediated by D(2) autoreceptors, but a role of postsynaptic D(3) receptors cannot be excluded. Finally, mechanisms underlying the contrasting influence of chemically diverse D(3) receptor antagonists upon locomotion remain to be elucidated.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBinding, CompetitiveCorpus StriatumDialysisDopamineDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsElectrochemistryExtracellular SpaceLocomotionMaleDopamineDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsDrd3 protein, ratReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D3

Identifiers

PMID14985929
OpenAlexW2063012995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.