Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14982548›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2004

Prize reinforcement contingency management for treating cocaine users: how low can we go, and with whom?

Nancy M Petry, Jacqueline Tedford, Mark Austin, Charla Nich, Kathleen M Carroll, Bruce J Rounsaville

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07208266 (Contingency Management as a Behavioral Intervention for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 133 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07208266 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Contingency Management as a Behavioral Intervention for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder : Implementation and Efficacy in the Inpatient Setting at Assiut University Hospital.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled55ConditionsOpioid Use Disorder (OUD)Armscontingency management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Prize-Based Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among People With HIV: A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Contingency management is effective in promoting abstinence and retention in treatment among crack cocaine users in Brazil: A randomized controlled trial.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2016
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy M PetryUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA. petry@psychiatry.uchc.edu
Jacqueline Tedford
Mark Austin
Charla Nich
Kathleen M Carroll
Bruce J Rounsaville
UConn Health · USYale University · US

Funding

TSF to enhance treatment of cocaine dependenceP50DA009241 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, KATHLEEN M. · 1994 to 2018
$40.5M
ZONISAMIDE VERSUS PLACEBOM01RR006192 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI DRAZINIC, CAROLYN M · 1994 to 2008
$22.1M
WHO COLLABORATIVE PROJECT ON MANAGEMENT OF HARMFUL ALCOHOL CONSUMPTIONP50AA003510 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 1985 to 2007
$13.6M
VOUCHERS VS PRIZES--CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENTR01DA013444 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ALESSI, SHEILA MARIE · 2000 to 2015
$6.2M
PSYCHOTHERAPY OF SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERSK05DA000457 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, KATHLEEN M. · 2000 to 2009
$1.2M
DIAGNOSIS &TREATMENT OF SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERSK05DA000089 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ROUNSAVILLE, BRUCE JAMES · 1988 to 2008
$1.0M
TREATMENT FOR DUALLY DEPENDENT METHADONE PATIENTSR29DA012056 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 1998 to 2002
$301k
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIC, PERFORMANCE AND SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF NICOTINEZ01DA000248 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI PICKWORTH, WALLACE BRUCE · 1993 to 2004
–
PSYCHOTHERAPY OF SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERSK02DA000248 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, KATHLEEN M · 1995 to 1999
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DA000248NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR006192NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR06192NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA003510NIAAA NIH HHS P50-AA03510NIDA NIH HHS K02-DA00248NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA000089NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA000457NIDA NIH HHS K05-DA00089NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009241NIDA NIH HHS P50-DA09241NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013444NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA13444NIDA NIH HHS R29-DA12056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study evaluated the efficacy of a low-cost, prize reinforcement contingency management (CM) intervention for reducing cocaine use.

settingCommunity-based treatment centers. PARTICIPANTS AND

designCocaine-abusing out-patients (n = 120) were assigned randomly to one of three 12-week conditions: standard treatment, standard treatment plus CM with an expected maximum of $80 of reinforcement or standard treatment plus CM with an expected maximum of $240 of reinforcement.

interventionIn the CM conditions, patients earned the opportunity to win prizes for submitting negative urine samples and completing goal-related activities. MEASUREMENTS: Drug use was measured at intake and throughout a 3-month treatment period.

findingsPatients in the $240 CM condition achieved more abstinence than patients in the standard condition. Patients who initiated treatment with positive urinalysis results were most responsive to the CM intervention, with the $240 CM condition engendering the best effects in this subgroup. In contrast, patients who initiated treatment with negative urinalysis results generally remained abstinent during treatment, regardless of treatment assignment. On average, patients in the two CM conditions earned $36 and $68 in prizes.

conclusionsThis study suggests that prize reinforcement CM may be suitable for community-based settings, and beneficial effects may be magnitude-dependent in more severe patients.

Indexed as

Reinforcement ScheduleAdultAnalysis of VarianceCocaine-Related DisordersCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHumansMalePatient ComplianceToken EconomyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID14982548
PMCPMC3709247
OpenAlexW2169246942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.