Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004
Does the type of competing interest statement affect readers' perceptions of the credibility of research? Randomised trial.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.PloS one · 2011Pooled it
- Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: a systematic review.Science and engineering ethics · 2005Pooled it
- Effect of revealing authors' conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Are Disease Awareness Links on Prescription Drug Websites Misleading? A Randomized Study.Journal of health communication · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Knowledge of undisclosed corporate authorship ("ghostwriting") reduces the perceived credibility of antidepressant research: a randomized vignette study with experienced nurses.BMC research notes · 2012Trial
- Values in environmental research: Citizens' views of scientists who acknowledge values.PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
- Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of systematic reviews: a methodological survey.BMJ open · 2016Article
- The Influence of Disclosure and Ethics Education on Perceptions of Financial Conflicts of Interest.Science and engineering ethics · 2015Article
- Conflict of interest in medical journals.Australian prescriber · 2015Article
- Article
- Disclosure of funding sources and conflicts of interest in phase III surgical trials: survey of ten general surgery journals.World journal of surgery · 2014Article
- Taking financial relationships into account when assessing research.Accountability in research · 2013Article
- Characteristics of physicians receiving large payments from pharmaceutical companies and the accuracy of their disclosures in publications: an observational study.BMC medical ethics · 2012Article
- A randomized study of how physicians interpret research funding disclosures.The New England journal of medicine · 2012Article
- Reporting of conflicts of interest from drug trials in Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2012Article
- Knowledge of ghostwriting and financial conflicts-of-interest reduces the perceived credibility of biomedical research.BMC research notes · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.