Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14977972›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2004

Characterization of oral Yersinia enterocolitica infection in three different strains of inbred mice.

Scott A Handley, Peter H Dube, Paula A Revell, Virginia L Miller

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nod2: The intestinal gate keeper.PLoS pathogens · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Infectious etiopathogenesis of Crohn's disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott A HandleyDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Peter H Dube
Paula A Revell
Virginia L Miller
Bipar · FRWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University DDRCC Supplemental Equipment RequestP30DK052574 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Nicholas O. Davidson · 2000 to 2026
$30.8M
ROVA REGULON AND VIRULENCE OF YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICAR01AI052167 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, VIRGINIA L · 2002 to 2012
$4.0M
MOLECULAR BASIS OF EPITHELIAL CELL INVASION BY YERSINIAR01AI027342 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, VIRGINIA L · 1989 to 2001
$711k
Role of IL-1 in Yersinia Induced Intestinal InflammationF32DK059700 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DUBE, PETER H · 2001 to 2002
$76k
NIAID NIH HHS AI27342NIAID NIH HHS AI52167NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052167NIDDK NIH HHS 1 F32DK59700-02NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK059700NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK052574NIDDK NIH HHS P30-DK52574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have highlighted differences in the resistances of various mouse strains to intravenous (i.v.) infection with Yersinia enterocolitica. In particular, differences in resistance and immunological response between BALB/c and C57BL/6 mouse strains have been determined. Following i.v infection, C57BL/6 mice are more resistant to Y. enterocolitica than are BALB/c mice. However, because Y. enterocolitica is typically a food-borne pathogen, the oral route of infection more accurately reflects the natural route of infection. Therefore, it was of interest to ascertain if the differences in resistance between mouse strains observed for an i.v. infection can be recapitulated following an oral infection. C57BL/6j, BALB/cj, and 129X1/Svj mouse strains presented no differences in 50% lethal dose (LD(50)) following oral infection with Y. enterocolitica. Subsequent analysis of cytokine levels, bacterial colonization and immune cell populations following oral infection confirmed characteristics previously described following i.v. Y. enterocolitica infection. All tissues analyzed from each mouse strain demonstrated a polarized Th1 cytokine profile and inflammatory cell influx throughout a 7-day course of infection. This immune response was present in all tissues and increased as bacterial colonization progressed. The lack of a differing LD(50) phenotype and common trends in immunological response among the three mouse strains tested suggests that oral infection is a useful model for studying the host response to Y. enterocolitica infection.

Indexed as

Yersinia enterocoliticaAdministration, OralAnimalsCytokinesLymph NodesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred StrainsPeyer's PatchesSpecies SpecificitySpleenTh1 CellsTh2 CellsYersinia InfectionsCytokines

Identifiers

PMID14977972
PMCPMC355989
OpenAlexW2124801880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.