ReviewDrugs2004
Treatment of HIV infection in pregnant women: antiretroviral management options.
Review in Drugs, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial of Protease Inhibitor-Including vs. Protease Inhibitor-Sparing Regimens for Women Who Initiate Therapy of HIV Infection During Pregnancy
Pharmacokinetic Properties of Antiretroviral and Related Drugs During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent sex trade and injection drug use among pregnant opiate and cocaine dependent women in treatment: The significance of psychiatric comorbidity.Addictive disorders & their treatment · 2010Article
- Characteristics of HIV-infected children recently diagnosed in Paris, France.European journal of pediatrics · 2006Article
- Persistence of nevirapine-resistant HIV-1 in women after single-dose nevirapine therapy for prevention of maternal-to-fetal HIV-1 transmission.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006Article
- Preterm premature rupture of membranes in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women: a novel case series.Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2006Article
- Cerebral MR imaging in uninfected children born to HIV-seropositive mothers and perinatally exposed to zidovudine.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing rates of HIV infection in women worldwide, especially among those of childbearing age, reinforce the importance of understanding the management of HIV in pregnancy. Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in the prevention of vertical HIV transmission, including the use of single and combination antiretroviral therapy, elective caesarean section as the preferred mode of delivery and the elimination of breast feeding. Multiple clinical trials assessing antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy have been carried out worldwide. The first pivotal clinical trial, the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 076 study, was conducted in 1994 using a three-part zidovudine regimen. Despite the success of this regimen at decreasing rates of vertical transmission, it is not affordable in many developing countries. Consequently, many international clinical trials have concentrated on short-course antiretroviral regimens including zidovudine alone, zidovudine and lamivudine, and nevirapine alone. In the developed world, the management of nonpregnant HIV-infected individuals has also undergone significant advances and has implications for the management of HIV in pregnancy. A number of countries have participated in the development of guidelines for the management of HIV in pregnancy, which recommend that HIV-infected pregnant women should be offered combination antiretroviral therapy based on viral load and CD4+ cell count cut-offs used for individuals who are not pregnant, preferably with the inclusion of zidovudine. However, to maximise the benefits to their offspring, therapy is recommended at lower viral load thresholds than for nonpregnant adults. For antiretroviral-naive women, therapy is deferred until the second trimester because of the potential and uncertain risk of teratogenesis and the low risk of transmission during this period. Research has also found that maternal factors including viral load, immune status, chorioamnionitis, prematurely ruptured membranes and, to a lesser extent, intravenous drug use and smoking are associated with increased vertical transmission. These represent potentially modifiable risk factors that should be addressed before and throughout pregnancy. Despite the benefits of antiretroviral therapy to reduce HIV vertical transmission, its use can be complicated by known and unknown risks of toxicity to the mother, fetus or both as well as carrying the risk of developing drug-resistant virus. The latter can potentially compromise future treatment options for both the mother and child. Other important challenges include the use of antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy when the mother does not meet criteria for them for her own health, and balancing the relative risks and benefits of elective caesarean section at various degrees of viral load suppression. Clinicians managing HIV in pregnancy need to keep up to date with all the literature to provide optimal care, including counselling to allow mothers to balance the risks and benefits while deciding on treatment for both themselves and their children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.