Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14977326›Full record

ArticleVisual neuroscience

A model of high-frequency oscillatory potentials in retinal ganglion cells.

Garrett T Kenyon, Bartlett Moore, Janelle Jeffs, Kate S Denning, Greg J Stephens, Bryan J Travis, John S George, James Theiler, David W Marshak

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Visual neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Contribution of retinal ganglion cells to the mouse electroretinogram.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The photopic negative response of flash ERG in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2008
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in retinal vein occlusion.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2006
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Garrett T KenyonP-21, Biophysics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA. gkenyon@lanl.gov
Bartlett Moore
Janelle Jeffs
Kate S Denning
Greg J Stephens
Bryan J Travis
John S George
James Theiler
David W Marshak

Funding

Neural Models of Plasticity: Molecules to NetworksP01NS038310 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BYRNE, JOHN H · 1999 to 2009
$9.3M
Structure and Function of Neurons in the Primate RetinaR01EY006472 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MARSHAK, DAVID W · 1986 to 2012
$4.2M
NEI NIH HHS EY06472NEI NIH HHS R01 EY006472NINDS NIH HHS NS38310NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS038310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-frequency oscillatory potentials (HFOPs) have been recorded from ganglion cells in cat, rabbit, frog, and mudpuppy retina and in electroretinograms (ERGs) from humans and other primates. However, the origin of HFOPs is unknown. Based on patterns of tracer coupling, we hypothesized that HFOPs could be generated, in part, by negative feedback from axon-bearing amacrine cells excited via electrical synapses with neighboring ganglion cells. Computer simulations were used to determine whether such axon-mediated feedback was consistent with the experimentally observed properties of HFOPs. (1) Periodic signals are typically absent from ganglion cell PSTHs, in part because the phases of retinal HFOPs vary randomly over time and are only weakly stimulus locked. In the retinal model, this phase variability resulted from the nonlinear properties of axon-mediated feedback in combination with synaptic noise. (2) HFOPs increase as a function of stimulus size up to several times the receptive-field center diameter. In the model, axon-mediated feedback pooled signals over a large retinal area, producing HFOPs that were similarly size dependent. (3) HFOPs are stimulus specific. In the model, gap junctions between neighboring neurons caused contiguous regions to become phase locked, but did not synchronize separate regions. Model-generated HFOPs were consistent with the receptive-field center dynamics and spatial organization of cat alpha cells. HFOPs did not depend qualitatively on the exact value of any model parameter or on the numerical precision of the integration method. We conclude that HFOPs could be mediated, in part, by circuitry consistent with known retinal anatomy.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAmacrine CellsAnimalsElectrophysiologyElectroretinographyGap JunctionsHumansInterneuronsNeural ConductionPhotic StimulationRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsSynapsesVisual FieldsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID14977326
PMCPMC3348786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.