ArticleFolia microbiologica2003
Effect of disinfectants on the metabolism of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship of Triamine-Biocide Tolerance of Salmonella enterica Serovar Senftenberg to Antimicrobial Susceptibility, Serum Resistance and Outer Membrane Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
- Commonly used disinfectants fail to eradicate Salmonella enterica biofilms from food contact surface materials.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial activity of 19 commercially manufactured disinfectant substances on a Salmonella enteritidis strain was determined. The substances represented 8 quaternary ammonium salts (QAS) and 10 QAS combined with other additives. The antimicrobial efficacy was characterized by influencing the growth of bacterial cells expressed as MIC and ED50 values as well as by the inhibition of the incorporation rate of 14C-adenine and 14C-leucine. According to their efficacy the disinfectants were divided into three groups: (1) substances with strong inhibitory effect (MIC 6-45 micrograms/L) such as Diesin forte, Hexaquart plus, Neoquat S, Triquart, Almyrol, Hexaquart S, ID212, ID213 and Microbac forte; (2) substances with good antibacterial efficacy (MIC 90-780 micrograms/L); (3) substances with MIC values > 780 micrograms/L (up to 3120 micrograms/L). Cetrimide had very low activity (MIC 3.12-6.25 mg/L). The effect of disinfectants on the biosynthetic processes was expressed by R values (IC50(Ade):IC50(Leu)); all these values were < 1 except Benzalkonium chloride, FD312, Divoquat forte, 5P plus, Almyrol, Hexaquart S and Hexaquart plus. Low R values suggested interference of these substances with the synthesis of both nucleic acids and proteins. All substances except 5P plus caused an inhibition of endogenous respiration. The most effective were Almyrol, Diesin forte, Microbac forte and Neoquat which completely inhibited respiration at 190 mg/L. Kvart showed the lowest effect on the respiration over the whole concentration range. The disinfectants also suppressed growth of S. enteritidis, probably by interfering with energy-yielding and-requiring processes in the cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.