Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14975043›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2004

Clinical review: Outreach - a strategy for improving the care of the acutely ill hospitalized patient.

Debby Bright, Wendy Walker, Julian Bion

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rapid response systems.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2008
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. An Audit of An Intensive Care Unit of A Tertiary Care Hospital.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Debby BrightReader in Intensive Care Medicine, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK. J.F.Bion@bham.ac.uk
Wendy Walker
Julian Bion
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the literature relating to the safe care of acutely ill hospitalized patients, and found that there are substantial opportunities for improvement. Recent research suggests substantial benefit may be obtained by systems of outreach care that facilitate better integration, co-ordination, collaboration and continuity of multidisciplinary care. Herein we review the various approaches that are being adopted, and suggest the need for continuing evaluation of these systems as they are introduced into different health care systems.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHospitalizationAcute DiseaseCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCommunity-Institutional RelationsHospitalistsHumansPatient Care TeamQuality Assurance, Health CareRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID14975043
PMCPMC420054
OpenAlexW2172204113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.