SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce morbidity and mortality in ventilated newborn infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce morbidity and mortality in ventilated newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007Pooled it
- [Recommendation for the prevention of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care patients with a birth weight less than 1,500 g. Report by the Committee of Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention of the Robert Koch Institute].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacterial colonisation of the respiratory tract is associated with intubation and may increase the risk of acquiring infection. This may prolong the need for mechanical ventilation and increase the risk of chronic lung disease. The use of prophylactic antibiotics has been advocated for all mechanically ventilated newborns in order to reduce the risk of colonisation and acquired infection. Countering this is the possibility that harm may outweigh benefit.
objectivesTo assess the effects of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing mortality and morbidity in intubated and ventilated newborn infants who are not known to have infection. In separate comparisons, we reviewed two different policies regarding the prophylactic use of antibiotics in intubated, ventilated infants: 1) among babies who are being intubated for mechanical ventilation, a policy of prophylactic antibiotics for the duration of intubation versus placebo or no treatment. 2) among intubated, ventilated babies who had been started on antibiotics at the time of intubation but whose initial cultures to rule our sepsis are negative, a policy of continuing versus discontinuing prophylactic antibiotics. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2003), CINAHL (1982 to May 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003), the Cochrane Neonatal Group Specialised Register and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of sufficient quality in which mechanically ventilated newborn infants are randomised to receive prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. MAIN
resultsOne study, of insufficient quality, met the criteria for inclusion in this review. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThere is no evidence from randomised trials to support or refute the use of prophylactic antibiotics when commencing mechanical ventilation in newborn infants, or to support or refute continuing antibiotics once initial cultures rule out infection in mechanically ventilated newborn infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.