Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14974048›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Adrenaline for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants with cardiovascular compromise.

M Paradisis, D A Osborn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06737965 (Cardiovascular Immaturity in Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06737965 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Cardiovascular Immaturity in Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns: a Fundamental Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2025 to 2025Enrolled15ConditionsELGAN (22-28SA), Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns, Cardiovascular ImmaturityArmsMedical abortion, Foetopathology exam, Outcomes mesurement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A meta-analysis of dopamine use in hypotensive preterm infants: blood pressure and cerebral hemodynamics.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Which inotrope for which baby?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M ParadisisRPA Newborn Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, Sydney, Australia.
D A Osborn
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInotropes are widely used in preterm infants to treat cardiovascular compromise, which may result from early adaptive problems of the transitional circulation, perinatal asphyxia or sepsis. Sustained hypotension and poor organ blood flow are associated with brain injury including peri/intraventricular haemorrhage and subsequent poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. Adrenaline (epinephrine) infusions are used in preterm infants with clinical cardiovascular compromise.

objectivesTo determine the effectiveness and safety of adrenaline compared to no treatment or other inotropes in reducing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants with cardiovascular compromise. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials were identified by searching MEDLINE (1966-August 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003) and EMBASE (1980 - 2003), supplemented with searches of reference lists of published trials and abstracts of conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of preterm newborn infants that compared adrenaline to no treatment or other inotropic agents (including dopamine, dobutamine, noradrenaline or isoprenaline). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted and analysed independently by two reviewers. Treatment effects on the following outcomes were to be determined: mortality in the newborn period, long term neurodevelopmental outcomes, radiological evidence of brain injury, short term haemodynamic changes, adverse drug effects and short term neonatal outcomes. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Studies were analysed for methodological quality using the criteria of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN

resultsOne ongoing study (Pellicer 2003) was identified. One study comparing adrenaline with dopamine infusion was included but was published in abstract form only (Phillipos 1996). It enrolled hypotensive, predominantly preterm infants in the first 24 hours. Only infants >1750g are included in this review (report for infants <=1750g appears incomplete). The study was reported as being randomised and double blinded, but methods were not reported. Both adrenaline and dopamine significantly increased heart rate and mean BP, with no statistically significant effect on left or right ventricular outputs. No other clinical outcomes were reported. No studies were identified that compared adrenaline to other inotropes, placebo or no treatment. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere are insufficient data on the use of adrenaline infusions in preterm infants with cardiovascular compromise to make recommendations for practice. There is a need for larger trials to determine whether adrenaline is effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants with cardiovascular compromise.

Indexed as

Cardiotonic AgentsDopamineEpinephrineHeart RateHumansHypotensionInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCardiotonic AgentsDopamineEpinephrine

Identifiers

PMID14974048
PMCPMC12159978
OpenAlexW2129234003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.