Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14974046›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Diazepam for treating tetanus.

C N Okoromah, F E A Lesi

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diazepam for treating tetanus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. VALTOCONeurology international · 2021
    Review
  8. Symptomatic treatments ofEncephalitis (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Maternal and neonatal tetanus.Lancet (London, England) · 2015
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C N OkoromahPaediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine of the University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
F E A Lesi
University of Lagos · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical management of the muscle spasms and rigidity of tetanus poses a difficult therapeutic problem to physicians everywhere, especially in resource poor countries. There are wide variations in therapeutic regimens commonly used in clinical practice due to uncertainties about effectiveness of conventional drugs. Diazepam compared to other drugs (eg phenobarbitone and chlorpromazine) may have advantages because of combined anticonvulsant, muscle relaxant, sedative and anxiolytic effects.

objectivesTo compare diazepam to other drugs in treating the muscle spasms and rigidity of tetanus in children and adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Neonatal Group trials register (October 2003), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2003), EMBASE (1980 to October 2003), LILACS (2003), CINAHL (October 2003), Science Citation Index, African Index Medicus, conference abstracts and reference lists of articles. We contacted researchers, experts and organizations working in the field and used personal communication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently identified eligible trials, assessed trial methodological quality and extracted data. MAIN

resultsTwo studies met the inclusion criteria. Method of generation of allocation sequence, concealment of allocation and blinding were unclear in both studies. A total of 134 children were allocated to three treatment groups comprising diazepam alone, phenobarbitone and chlorpromazine, or phenobarbitone and chlorpromazine and diazepam.Meta-analysis of in-hospital deaths indicates that children treated with diazepam alone had a better chance of survival than those treated with combination of phenobarbitone and chlorpromazine (Relative Risk for death 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.86; Risk Difference -0.22; 95% CI -0.38 to -0.06). Giving diazepam alone, or supplementing conventional anticonvulsants (phenobarbitone and chlorpromazine) with diazepam, was reported in one study to be associated with a statistically significantly milder clinical course and shorter duration of hospitalization. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsAlthough there is evidence that diazepam alone compared with combination of phenobarbitone and chlorpromazine is more effective in treating tetanus, the small size, methodological limitations and lack of data on drug safety from available trials preclude definite conclusions to support change in current clinical practice. The application of the present evidence should be moderated by local needs and circumstances, pending the availability of more evidence. We recommend a large multicenter, randomized controlled trial which compares diazepam alone with combinations of other drugs (excluding diazepam).

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsChildChild, PreschoolDiazepamHospital MortalityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMuscle Relaxants, CentralRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTetanusAnticonvulsantsDiazepamMuscle Relaxants, Central

Identifiers

PMID14974046
PMCPMC8759227
OpenAlexW1826191554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.