SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Systemic antifungal drugs for invasive fungal infection in preterm infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antifungal therapy for newborn infants with invasive fungal infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Antifungal therapy in infants and children with proven, probable or suspected invasive fungal infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Wide intra- and inter-country variability in drug use and dosage in very-low-birth-weight newborns with severe infections.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Article
- The use of ciprofloxacin and fluconazole in Italian neonatal intensive care units: a nationwide survey.BMC pediatrics · 2013Article
- Use of antifungal agents in pediatric and adult high-risk areas.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012Article
- Invasive fungal infection in very low birthweight infants: national prospective surveillance study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInvasive fungal infection is an increasingly common cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. In addition to amphotericin B, a variety of newer antifungal drugs and drug preparations are available for treatment. There is a need to assess their relative merits.
objectivesIn preterm infants with suspected or confirmed invasive fungal infection, does treatment with newer systemic antifungal drugs or drug preparations, versus conventional amphotericin B alone, reduce mortality and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes? SEARCH STRATEGY: We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 - August 2003), EMBASE (1980 - August 2003), conference proceedings, and previous reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised control trials comparing one antifungal agent or combination of agents with another in preterm infants with suspected or confirmed invasive fungal infection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted the data using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by each author, and synthesis of data using relative risk and risk difference. The pre-specified outcomes were death prior to hospital discharge, longer term neurodevelopment, and adverse drug reactions resulting in discontinuation of therapy. MAIN
resultsWe identified only one small trial. This study compared the use of fluconazole with amphotericin B (5-Fluorocytosine added if fungal meningitis present). Three of 11 infants who were treated with fluconazole died and four of 10 infants who were treated with amphotericin B died : Relative risk: 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.20, 2.33), Risk Difference -0.13 (95% confidence interval -0.53, 0.27) There were not any data on longer term outcomes. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsFrom this one small study there are insufficient data to favour one antifungal agent or combination to reduce mortality and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants with suspected or confirmed invasive fungal infection. A large randomised controlled trial is required to compare the newer antifungal preparations with conventional amphotericin B. Further research may also determine the relative convenience and cost effectiveness of the available drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.