Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14974045›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Systemic antifungal drugs for invasive fungal infection in preterm infants.

L Clerihew, W McGuire

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antifungal therapy for newborn infants with invasive fungal infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Use of antifungal agents in pediatric and adult high-risk areas.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Article
  6. Invasive fungal infection in very low birthweight infants: national prospective surveillance study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L ClerihewTayside Institute of Child Health, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK, DD1 9SY.
W McGuire
Australian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive fungal infection is an increasingly common cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. In addition to amphotericin B, a variety of newer antifungal drugs and drug preparations are available for treatment. There is a need to assess their relative merits.

objectivesIn preterm infants with suspected or confirmed invasive fungal infection, does treatment with newer systemic antifungal drugs or drug preparations, versus conventional amphotericin B alone, reduce mortality and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes? SEARCH STRATEGY: We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 - August 2003), EMBASE (1980 - August 2003), conference proceedings, and previous reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised control trials comparing one antifungal agent or combination of agents with another in preterm infants with suspected or confirmed invasive fungal infection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted the data using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by each author, and synthesis of data using relative risk and risk difference. The pre-specified outcomes were death prior to hospital discharge, longer term neurodevelopment, and adverse drug reactions resulting in discontinuation of therapy. MAIN

resultsWe identified only one small trial. This study compared the use of fluconazole with amphotericin B (5-Fluorocytosine added if fungal meningitis present). Three of 11 infants who were treated with fluconazole died and four of 10 infants who were treated with amphotericin B died : Relative risk: 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.20, 2.33), Risk Difference -0.13 (95% confidence interval -0.53, 0.27) There were not any data on longer term outcomes. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsFrom this one small study there are insufficient data to favour one antifungal agent or combination to reduce mortality and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants with suspected or confirmed invasive fungal infection. A large randomised controlled trial is required to compare the newer antifungal preparations with conventional amphotericin B. Further research may also determine the relative convenience and cost effectiveness of the available drugs.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesMycosesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID14974045
OpenAlexW1874932580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.