Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14974042›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Pneumococcal vaccines for sickle cell disease.

E G Davies, C Riddington, R Lottenberg, N Dower

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines for sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Piracetam for reducing the incidence of painful sickle cell disease crises.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Sickle cell disease.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  10. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults: a meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Molecular characterization ofMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

E G DaviesHost Defence Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, UK, WC1N 3JH.
C Riddington
R Lottenberg
N Dower
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBFlorida College · USGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBHealth Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with sickle cell disease are particularly susceptible to pneumococcal infection, which may be fatal. Infants (children aged up to 23 months) are at particularly high risk, but conventional polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines may be ineffective in this age group. New conjugate pneumococcal vaccines are now available, which may help to reduce the incidence of infection in people with sickle cell disease.

objectivesTo determine the efficacy of pneumococcal vaccines for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with sickle cell disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group trials register, comprising of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and hand searching relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. In addition, we contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies and experts in the field.Date of most recent search of Group's trials register: November 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing a polysaccharide or conjugate pneumococcal vaccine regimen with a different regimen or no vaccination in people with sickle cell disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN

resultsNine trials were identified in the searches and five trials, with a total of 547 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Only one trial reported incidence of pneumococcal infection, and this demonstrated that the polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine used (PPV14) failed to significantly reduce the risk of infection in children under three years of age, but was associated with only minor adverse events. Three trials of conjugate pneumococcal vaccines found that immune response was increased compared to control groups, including in infants, although clinical outcomes were not measured in these trials. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsPrevious trials have shown that conjugate pneumococcal vaccines are safe and effective in normal healthy patients, even those under the age of two years. The controlled trials included in this review have demonstrated immunogenicity (the body's response, without which there is no protection) of these vaccines, and observational studies in people with sickle cell disease support these findings. We therefore recommend that conjugate pneumococcal vaccines are used in people with sickle cell disease. Randomised trials in patients with sickle cell disease will be needed to determine the optimal vaccination regimen when further, potentially more effective vaccines become available. Such trials should measure clinical outcomes of effectiveness.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellChildHumansPneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaccines, ConjugatePneumococcal VaccinesVaccines, Conjugate

Identifiers

PMID14974042
PMCPMC11927627
OpenAlexW1951816138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.