Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14974036›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Antibiotics for ureaplasma in the vagina in pregnancy.

C H Raynes-Greenow, C L Roberts, J C Bell, B Peat, G L Gilbert

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics for ureaplasma in the vagina in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas as neonatal pathogens.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2005
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C H Raynes-GreenowCentre for Perinatal Health Services Research, University of Sydney, QE 11 Research Institute, Building DO2, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
C L Roberts
J C Bell
B Peat
G L Gilbert
University of Sydney · AUInstitute of Clinical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth is a significant obstetric problem in high-income countries. Genital infection including ureaplasmas are suspected of playing a role in preterm birth and preterm rupture of the membranes. Antibiotics are used to treat women with preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes and results in prolongation of pregnancy and lowers the risks of maternal and neonatal infection. However, antibiotics may be beneficial earlier in pregnancy to eradicate potentially causative agents.

objectivesThe objective of this review is to assess whether antibiotic treatment of pregnant women with ureaplasma in the vagina reduces the incidence of preterm birth and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (April 2003). SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials that compared any antibiotic regimen with placebo or no treatment in pregnant women with ureaplasma detected in the vagina. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently assessed eligibility and trial quality and extracted data. MAIN

resultsOne trial involving 1071 women was included. Of these, 644 randomly received antibiotic treatment (174 erythromycin estolate, 224 erythromycin sterate, and 246 clindamycin hydrochloride) and 427 received placebo. This trial did not report data on preterm birth. Incidence of low birthweight less than 2500 grams was only evaluated for erythromycin (combined) (n = 398 ) compared to placebo (n = 427) and there was no statistically significant difference between those treated and those not treated (relative risk (RR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 1.07). In regards to side-effects sufficient to stop treatment, data were available for all women, and there were no statistically significant differences between any antibiotic (combined) and the placebo group (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.85). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to show whether giving antibiotics to women with ureaplasma in the vagina will prevent preterm birth.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUreaplasma InfectionsVaginal DiseasesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID14974036
OpenAlexW4249208659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.