Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14974035›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures.

R A Gosselin, I Roberts, W J Gillespie

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 286 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Wound management in disaster settings.World journal of surgery · 2015
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Evidence-based treatment of open ankle fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2011
    Pooled it
  12. Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  13. Recommendations for the treatment of osteomyelitis.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  14. Trial
  15. [Staged comprehensive limb reconstruction strategy and effectiveness analysis for severe open lower leg injury].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R A GosselinPO Box 1983, El Granada, California 94018, USA.
I Roberts
W J Gillespie
University of Hull · GBUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWound and bone infections are frequently associated with open fractures of the extremities and may add significantly to the resulting morbidity. The administration of antibiotics is routinely used in developed countries as an adjunct to a comprehensive management protocol that also includes irrigation, surgical debridement and stabilisation when indicated, and is thought to reduce the frequency of infections.

objectivesTo quantify the evidence for the effectiveness of antibiotics in the initial treatment of open fractures of the limbs. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group specialised register (April 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2003), EMBASE (1988 to April 2003), LILACS (1992 to June 2002) and reference lists of articles. Proceedings of meetings of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (1980 to 2001), the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (1990 to 2001) and the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologique (1980 to 2001) were hand searched. We also contacted published researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials involving: participants - people of any age with open fractures of the limbs; intervention - antibiotic administered before or at the time of primary treatment of the open fracture compared with placebo or no antibiotic; outcome measures - early wound infection, chronic drainage, acute or chronic osteomyelitis, delayed unions or non-unions, amputations and deaths. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently screened papers for inclusion, assessed trial quality using an eight item scale, and extracted data. Additional information was sought from three trialists. Pooled data are presented graphically. MAIN

resultsData from 913 participants in seven studies were analysed. The use of antibiotics had a protective effect against early infection compared with no antibiotics or placebo (relative risk 0.41 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.63); absolute risk reduction 0.08 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.12); NNT 13 (95% CI 8 to 25)). There were insufficient data in the included studies to evaluate other outcomes. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsAntibiotics reduce the incidence of early infections in open fractures of the limbs. Further placebo controlled randomised trials are unlikely to be justified in middle and high income countries. Further research is necessary to the determine the avoidable burden of morbidity in countries where antibiotics are not used routinely in the management of open fractures.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisFractures, OpenHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWound Infection

Identifiers

PMID14974035
PMCPMC8728739
OpenAlexW1522457301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.