SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Trifluoperazine for schizophrenia.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 229 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chlorpromazine dose for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Trifluoperazine versus placebo for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Changes in body weight and psychotropic drugs: a systematic synthesis of the literature.PloS one · 2012Pooled it
- Antipsychotic medication for early episode schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Amelioration of gentamicin-induced acute kidney injury by trifluoperazine: in vivo mechanistic insights.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Current Overview of the Biology and Pharmacology in Sugen/Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension in Rats.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2024Review
- MiRAGE: mining relationships for advanced generative evaluation in drug repositioning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Insights into the Medical Evaluation of Ekbom Syndrome: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Green Synthetic Strategies and Pharmaceutical Applications of Thiazine and its Derivatives: An Updated Review.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2024Review
- Psilocin suppresses methamphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and acquisition of conditioned place preference via D2R-mediated ERK signaling.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2023Article
- Understanding the role of dopamine in cancer: past, present and future.Carcinogenesis · 2022Review
- Trifluoperazine and Its Analog Suppressed the Tumorigenicity of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell; Applicability of Antipsychotic Drugs to Lung Cancer Treatment.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- The Food and Drug Administration-approved antipsychotic drug trifluoperazine, a calmodulin antagonist, inhibits viral replication through PERK-eIF2α axis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- The endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein Sec62 as potential therapeutic target inFrontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- How robust are findings of pairwise and network meta-analysis in the presence of missing participant outcome data?BMC medicine · 2021Article
- Identification and validation of a five-lncRNA signature for predicting survival with targeted drug candidates in ovarian cancer.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Drug rechanneling: A novel paradigm for cancer treatment.Seminars in cancer biology · 2021Review
- Inhibitory Effects of Trifluoperazine on Peripheral Proinflammatory Cytokine Expression and Hypothalamic Microglia Activation in Obese Mice Induced by Chronic Feeding With High-Fat-Diet.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021Article
- Calmodulin inhibitors improve erythropoiesis in Diamond-Blackfan anemia.Science translational medicine · 2020Article
- Repositioning of the antipsychotic drug TFP for sepsis treatment.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrifluoperazine is an inexpensive accessible 'high potency' antipsychotic drug, widely used to treat schizophrenia or related psychoses.
objectivesTo estimate the effects of trifluoperazine compared with placebo and other drugs. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register of trials (March 2002), supplemented with hand searching, reference searching, personal communication and contact with industry. SELECTION CRITERIA: All clinical randomised trials involving people with schizophrenia and comparing trifluoperazine with any other treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were reliably selected and quality rated and data was extracted. For dichotomous data, relative risks (RR) were estimated, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where possible, we undertook intention-to-treat analyses. For statistically significant results, the number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated. We estimated heterogeneity (I-square technique) and publication bias. MAIN
results1162 people from 13 studies were randomised to trifluoperazine or placebo. For global improvement, small short-term studies favoured trifluoperazine (n=95, 3 RCTs, RR 0.62 CI 0.49 to 0.78 NNT 3 CI 2 to 4). Loss to follow up was about 12% in both groups (n=280, 7 RCTs, RR 0.99 CI 0.62 to 1.57) and more people allocated trifluoperazine used antiparkinson drugs to alleviate movements disorders compared with placebo (n=195, 4 RCTs, RR 5.06 CI 2.49 to 10.27, NNH 4 CI 2 to 9). 2230 people from 49 studies were randomised to trifluoperazine or another older generation antipsychotic. Trifluoperazine was not clearly different in terms of 'no substantial improvement' (n=1016, 27 RCTs, RR 1.06 CI 0.98 to 1.14) or leaving the study early (n=930, 22 RCTs, RR 1.15 CI 0.83 to 1.58). Almost identical numbers of people reported at least one adverse event (60%) in each group (n=585, 14 RCTs, RR 0.99 CI 0.87 to 1.13), although trifluoperazine was more likely to cause extrapyramidal adverse effects overall when compared to low potency antipsychotics such as chlorpromazine (n=130, 3 RCTs, RR 1.66 CI 1.03 to 2.67, NNH 6 CI 3 to 121). One small study (n=38) found no clear differences between trifluoperazine and the atypical drug, sulpiride. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsAlthough there are shortcomings and gaps in the data, there appears to be enough consistency over different outcomes and periods to confirm that trifluoperazine is an antipsychotic of similar efficacy to other commonly used neuroleptics for people with schizophrenia. Its adverse events profile is similar to that of other drugs. It has been claimed that trifluoperazine is effective at low doses for patients with schizophrenia but this does not appear to be based on good quality trial based evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.