Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14974012›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004

Physical fitness training for stroke patients.

D H Saunders, C A Greig, A Young, G E Mead

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Physical fitness training for stroke patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Physical fitness training for stroke patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Water-based exercises for improving activities of daily living after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D H SaundersDepartment of Physical Education Sport and Leisure Studies, University of Edinburgh, St Leonards Land, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK, EH8 2AZ.
C A Greig
A Young
G E Mead
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke patients have impaired physical fitness and this may exacerbate their disability. It is not known whether improving physical fitness after stroke reduces disability.

objectivesThe primary aims of the review were to establish whether physical fitness training reduces death, dependence and disability after stroke. The secondary aims of the review included an investigation of the effects of fitness training on secondary outcome measures (including, physical fitness, mobility, physical function, health and quality of life, mood and the incidence of adverse events). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (June 2003). In addition, the following electronic databases were searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2002 Issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2002), EMBASE (1980 to December 2002), CINAHL (1982 to December 2002), SPORTDiscus (1949 to December 2002), Science Citation Index Expanded (1981 to December 2002), Web of Science Proceedings (1982 to December 2002), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (December 2002), REHABDATA (1956 to December 2002) and Index to UK Theses (1970 to December 2002). We hand searched relevant journals and conference proceedings and screened reference lists. To identify unpublished and ongoing trials we searched trials directories and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials were included when an intervention represented a clear attempt to improve either muscle strength and/or cardiorespiratory fitness, and whose control groups comprised either usual care or a non-exercise intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data from eligible studies were independently extracted by two reviewers. The primary outcome measures were death, disability and dependence. The lack of common outcome measures prevented some of the intended analysis. MAIN

resultsA total of twelve trials were included in the review. No trials reported death and dependence data. Two small trials reporting disability showed no evidence of benefit. The remaining available secondary outcome data suggest that cardiorespiratory training improves walking ability (mobility). Observed benefits appear to be associated with specific or 'task-related' training. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere are few data available to guide clinical practice at present with regard to fitness training interventions after stroke. More general research is needed to explore the efficacy and feasibility of training, particularly soon after stroke. In addition more specific studies are required to explore the effect of content and type of training. Further research will require careful planning to address a number of issues peculiar to this type of intervention.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyPhysical FitnessStroke RehabilitationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID14974012
OpenAlexW4211030233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.