SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Rotavirus vaccine for preventing diarrhoea.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Management for intussusception in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Concordance of effects of medical interventions on hospital admission and readmission rates with effects on mortality.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013Pooled it
- Comparative effect sizes in randomised trials from less developed and more developed countries: meta-epidemiological assessment.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2013Pooled it
- Gastroenteritis in children.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011Pooled it
- Rotavirus vaccine and diarrhea mortality: quantifying regional variation in effect size.BMC public health · 2011Pooled it
- The effect of rotavirus vaccine on diarrhoea mortality.International journal of epidemiology · 2010Pooled it
- Gastroenteritis in children.BMJ clinical evidence · 2009Pooled it
- 'First 1000 days' health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: alignment of South African policies with high-quality evidence.Global health action · 2017Article
- A Preliminary Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccine Effectiveness in Zambia.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Article
- Article
- Essential interventions for child health.Reproductive health · 2014Review
- Essential interventions: implementation strategies and proposed packages of care.Reproductive health · 2014Article
- Vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and gastroenteritis.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2011Review
- Burden of disease & molecular epidemiology of group A rotavirus infections in India.The Indian journal of medical research · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRotaviruses cause viral gastroenteritis and result in more deaths from diarrhoea in children under 5 years of age than any other single agent, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
objectivesTo assess rotavirus vaccines in relation to preventing rotavirus diarrhoea, death, and adverse events. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group's trial register (October 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2003), EMBASE (January 1980 to October 2003), LILACS (1982 to October 2003), Biological Abstracts (January 1982 to October 2003), reference lists of articles, and contacted researchers and rotavirus vaccine manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing rotavirus vaccines to placebo, no intervention, or other rotavirus vaccines in children and adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial methodological quality, and contacted trial authors for additional information. MAIN
resultsSixty-four trials provided information on efficacy and safety of three main types of rotavirus vaccine (bovine, human, and rhesus) for 21,070 children. Different levels of efficacy were demonstrated with different vaccines varying from 22 to 89% to prevent one episode of rotavirus diarrhoea, 11 to 44% to prevent one episode of all-cause diarrhoea, and 43 to 90% to prevent one episode of severe rotavirus diarrhoea. Rhesus vaccine demonstrated a similar efficacy against one episode of rotavirus diarrhoea (37 and 44% respectively), and one episode of all-cause diarrhoea (around 15%) for trials performed in high and middle-income countries. Results on mortality and safety of the vaccines were scarce and incomplete. We noticed important heterogeneity among the pooled studies and were unable to discard a biased estimation of effect. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsCurrent evidence shows that rhesus rotavirus vaccines (particularly RRV-TV) and the human rotavirus vaccine 89-12 are efficacious in preventing diarrhoea caused by rotavirus and all-cause diarrhoea. Evidence about safety, and about mortality or prevention of severe outcomes, is scarce and inconclusive. Bovine rotavirus vaccines were also efficacious, but safety data are not available. Trials of new rotavirus vaccines will hopefully improve the evidence base. Randomized controlled trials should be performed simultaneously in high-, middle-, and low-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.