SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Topical ointment for preventing infection in preterm infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infection in preterm infants receiving topical emollient oil massage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Pooled it
- Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Topical emollient for preventing infection in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Topical emollient for preventing infection in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Clean birth and postnatal care practices to reduce neonatal deaths from sepsis and tetanus: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect.BMC public health · 2011Pooled it
- Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulins to prevent staphylococcal infection in very low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Mupirocin forPediatrics · 2019Trial
- Effectiveness of No-Sting skin protectant and Aquaphor on water loss and skin integrity in premature infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2010Trial
- Skin care practices in newborn nurseries and mother-baby units in Maryland.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017Review
- Antiseptic use in the neonatal intensive care unit - a dilemma in clinical practice: An evidence based review.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2016Review
- Skin Physiology of the Neonate and Infant: Clinical Implications.Advances in wound care · 2015Review
- Lowered humidity produces human epidermal equivalents with enhanced barrier properties.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2015Article
- Emollient therapy for preterm newborn infants--evidence from the developing world.BMC public health · 2013Review
- The infant skin barrier: can we preserve, protect, and enhance the barrier?Dermatology research and practice · 2012Article
- A pilot study of emollient therapy for the primary prevention of atopic dermatitis.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2010Article
- Unraveling the mystery of vernix caseosa.Indian journal of dermatology · 2008Article
- [Special features of the skin in newborns and young infants].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNosocomial sepsis is a frequent and serious complication of premature infants. The increased susceptibility of ELBW infants to infection has been attributed to less effective immune function compared to mature newborns and the invasive nature of necessary supportive care. Breakdown of the barrier function of the skin may be an additional risk factor for nosocomial sepsis.
objectivesTo assess the effect of prophylactic application of topical ointment on nosocomial sepsis rates and other complications of prematurity in preterm infants. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2003), Ovid DC MEDLINE through June 2003, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials which compared the effect of prophylactic application of topical ointment to routine (standard) skin care or as needed topical therapy in preterm infants are included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including infection [including any bacterial infection, bacterial infection with a known pathogen, coagulase negative staphylococcal infection, fungal infection, and any nosocomial infection (bacterial or fungal)], patent ductus arteriosus, oxygen requirement at 28 days, chronic lung disease and mortality were excerpted from the reports of the clinical trials by the reviewers. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN
resultsFour randomized controlled trials were identified. All four studies reported improved skin condition in infants treated with prophylactic topical ointment (results not reported here). All four studies reported on the incidence of any nosocomial infection, fungal infection and coagulase negative staphylococcal infection. Infants treated with prophylactic topical ointment are at increased risk of coagulase negative staphylococcal infection (typical relative risk 1.31, 95% CI 1.02, 1.70; typical risk difference 0.04, 95% CI 0.00, 0.08); and any nosocomial infection (typical relative risk 1.20, 95% CI 1.00, 1.43; typical risk difference 0.05, 95% CI 0.00, 0.09). A trend toward increased risk of any bacterial infection was found in infants treated with prophylactic topical ointment (typical relative risk 1.19, 95% CI 0.97, 1.46; typical risk difference 0.04, 95% CI -0.01, 0.08). There was no significant difference found in the risk of bacterial infection with a known pathogen, fungal infection, or other complications related to prematurity. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsProphylactic application of topical ointment increases the risk of coagulase negative staphylococcal infection and any nosocomial infection. A trend toward increased risk of any bacterial infection was noted in infants prophylactically treated. Topical ointment should not be used routinely in preterm infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.