SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2004
Prostanoids for intermittent claudication.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prostanoids for intermittent claudication.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Naftidrofuryl for intermittent claudication.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Peripheral arterial disease.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011Pooled it
- Molecular Mediated Angiogenesis and Vasculogenesis Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Dendritic Cells of Leukemic Origin: Specialized Antigen-Presenting Cells as Potential Treatment Tools for Patients with Myeloid Leukemia.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2020Review
- PGEInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Drug treatment of peripheral arterial disease in the elderly.Drugs & aging · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) is a common cause of morbidity in the general population. While numerous studies have established the efficacy of prostanoids in PAOD stages III and IV the question of the role of prostanoids as an alternative or additive treatment in patients suffering from claudicatio intermittens (PAOD II) has not yet been clearly answered.
objectivesThe aim of this review was to evaluate effects of prostanoids in patients with intermittent claudication. SEARCH STRATEGY: Computerised searches of the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Specialised Register (last searched April 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (last searched Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE and EMBASE were undertaken. In addition relevant journals were hand-searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trials describing the effects of prostanoids in the treatment of patients suffering from intermittent claudication have been considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All reviewers assessed the quality of studies and extracted data unblinded. Statistical analysis including tests for heterogeneity and overall effect were performed by using MetaView of Review Manager 4.2. All numeric values are expressed as mean +/- Standard deviation (SD). MAIN
resultsEighteen studies were included for analysis. A significant heterogeneity between the included studies was detected in most of the subgroup analysis. Five studies compared the effects of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) versus placebo, and reported in their individual results significant increases in walking distances after the administration of PGE1. The attained increase in walking distances appears to be not merely a short-term effect because several studies reported that walking capacity remained increased even after termination of treatment. On the other hand, oral or intravenous prostacyclin did not increase the walking distances significantly. At least one adverse reaction was reported from 23.6% of the patients treated with prostacyclin (PGI2), and its analogues and from 13.7% of the patients treated with PGE1. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsBecause of the heterogeneity between most of the included studies, we did not pool relevant parts of the data by meta-analysis. Based on the individual results of the published literature, patients with intermittent claudication seem to benefit from administration (intravenous or intra-arterial) of PGE1 by a significant improvement of their walking capacity. Further well-conducted randomized, double blinded trials, with a sufficient number of patients to provide statistical powerful information, should be performed to confirm the results of this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.