Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14970851›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2004

Hormone replacement therapy after surgery for stage 1 or 2 cutaneous melanoma.

R M MacKie, C A Bray

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Narrative Review of the Role of Estrogen (Receptors) in Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The epidemiology of melanoma in young adults.Expert review of dermatology · 2013
    Article
  10. Epidemiology of invasive cutaneous melanoma.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2009
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R M MacKiePublic Health and Health Policy University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK. R.M.Mackie@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
C A Bray

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 206 women were followed for a minimum of 5 years after primary melanoma surgery to establish if hormone replacement therapy (HRT) adversely affected prognosis. In all, 123 had no HRT and 22 have died of melanoma; 83 had HRT for varying periods and one has died of melanoma. After controlling for known prognostic factors, we conclude that HRT after melanoma does not adversely affect prognosis.

Indexed as

Hormone Replacement TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRegression AnalysisSkin NeoplasmsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID14970851
PMCPMC2410176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.