Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14967124›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2004

[Patients over-using a primary care centre: their social, demographic and clinical characteristics, and their use of health service facilities].

M A Ortega Tallón, G Roca Figueres, M Iglesias Rodríguez, J M Jurado Serrano

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M A Ortega TallónEspecialista en Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Atención Primaria Terrassa Nord, Unidad Docente de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria, Consorcio Sanitario de Terrassa. Barcelona, España. sdireccioctn@csdt.es
G Roca Figueres
M Iglesias Rodríguez
J M Jurado Serrano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo find the social and clinical characteristics of patients over-using (OUP) our centre. To find how much these patients use the health services.

designObservational, descriptive study.

settingUrban primary care centre (36 408 inhabitants).

participantsPatients over 15 seen at the centre during the year 2000, who exceeded in their number of attendances the mean plus two standard deviations for their age group. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The records of OUPS were reviewed to analyse their social and demographic characteristics, kinds of attendance, reasons for consultation, further tests, medication, referrals, and time off work this year.

resultsThe sample was of 954 OUPs, 50.9% of whom were male with an average age of 50.54 (SD, 19.68). 86.3% had some risk factor recorded (34% hypertension, 32.4% mental health, 27.7% obesity, 25.7% tobacco dependency, 17.7% diabetes mellitus). They generated a mean of 9.6 visits to the doctor per year, with 95% CI (8.09-11.19), with the most common reason for attendance the monitoring of acute pathology (19.29%), followed by monitoring of chronic pathology (14.32%). There was an average of 1 analysis per OUP per year, and 0.68 image tests per OUP per year (48.38% were simple x-rays). 46.8% of the medication prescribed were analgesics. Average time off work was 0.5 periods off per OUP per year, with a mean period of 49.4 days off (SD, 113.69). They engendered an average of 4.15 nursing visits per OUP per year, 95% CI (2.60-5.70), with monitoring of chronic pathology the most common reason for consultation. 30.3% of OUP had a visit to hospital casualty recorded, with osteo-muscular pathology the most common reason for consultation (34.29%). Mean referrals were 0.88 OUP per year, with traumatology being the department to which most referrals were made (13.92%).

conclusionsOUP are middle-aged, have associated chronic pathology and use programmed appointments a lot. The additional tests conducted matched the centre's procedures for monitoring chronic pathologies. The most common reason for attendance at casualty was traumatology, as was the specialist clinic to which most referrals were made.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleHealth ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOffice VisitsReferral and ConsultationRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID14967124
PMCPMC7668804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.