Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14966304›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2004

Spreading dilatation in rat mesenteric arteries associated with calcium-independent endothelial cell hyperpolarization.

Hiromichi Takano, Kim A Dora, Michaela M Spitaler, Chris J Garland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effects of βBMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2020
    Article
  5. Optical imaging and modulation of neurovascular responses.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. KJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017
    Article
  9. Boosting the signal: Endothelial inward rectifier KMicrocirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Conducted dilatation to ATP and KActa physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. EDHF: spreading the influence of the endothelium.British journal of pharmacology · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiromichi TakanoDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Kim A Dora
Michaela M Spitaler
Chris J Garland
University of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both ACh and levcromakalim evoke smooth muscle cell hyperpolarization and associated relaxation in rat mesenteric resistance arteries. We investigated if they could evoke conducted vasodilatation along isolated arteries, whether this reflected spreading hyperpolarization and the possible mechanism involved. Focal micropipette application of either ACh, to stimulate endothelial cell muscarinic receptors, or levcromakalim, to activate smooth muscle K(ATP) channels, each evoked a local dilatation (88 +/- 14%, n= 6 and 92 +/- 6% reversal of phenylephrine-induced tone, n= 11, respectively) that rapidly spread upstream (at 1.5 mm 46 +/- 19%, n= 6 and 57 +/- 13%, n= 9) to dilate the entire isolated artery. The local dilatation to ACh was associated with a rise in endothelial cell [Ca(2+)](i) (F/F(t = 0)= 1.22 +/- 0.33, n= 14) which did not spread beyond 0.5 mm (F/F(t = 0)= 1.01 +/- 0.01, n= 14), while the local dilatation to levcromakalim was not associated with any change in endothelial cell [Ca(2+)](i). In contrast, ACh and levcromakalim both stimulated local (12.7 +/- 1.2 mV, n= 10 and 13.5 +/- 4.7 mV, n= 10) and spreading (at 2 mm: 3.0 +/- 1.1 mV, n= 5 and 4.1 +/- 0.7 mV, n= 5) smooth muscle hyperpolarization. The spread of hyperpolarization could be prevented by cutting the artery, so was not due to a diffusible agent. Both the spreading dilatation and hyperpolarization were endothelium dependent. The injection of propidium iodide into either endothelial or smooth muscle cells revealed extensive dye coupling between the endothelial cells, but limited coupling between the smooth muscle cells. Some evidence for heterocellular spread of dye was also evident. Together, these data show that vasodilatation can spread over significant distances in mesenteric resistance arteries, and suggest this reflects an effective coupling between the endothelial cells to facilitate [Ca(2+)](i)-independent spread of hyperpolarization.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAniline CompoundsAnimalsBariumCalciumCromakalimEndothelial CellsFluorescent DyesGlyburideIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMembrane PotentialsMesenteric ArteriesMicroscopy, FluorescenceMyocytes, Smooth MuscleNG-Nitroarginine Methyl EsterAcetylcholineAniline CompoundsBariumCalciumCromakalimFluo 4Fluorescent DyesGlyburideNG-Nitroarginine Methyl EsterOrganic ChemicalsPhenylephrinePropidiumSYTOX GreenXanthenes

Identifiers

PMID14966304
PMCPMC1665000
OpenAlexW1510588853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.