Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14965387›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2004

Remedy or cure? Lay beliefs about over-the-counter medicines for coughs and colds.

Gina Johnson, Cecil Helman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Challenges of tuberculosis management in high and low prevalence countries in a mobile world.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2014
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gina JohnsonStopsley Group Practice, Wigmore Lane Health Centre, Luton LU2 8BG, UK. gina.johnson01@ntlworld.com
Cecil Helman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 500 million is spent in the United Kingdom every year on over-the-counter medicines for coughs and colds. Evidence for their pharmacological efficacy is lacking.

aimTo examine lay beliefs about over-the-counter medicines for coughs and colds. To explore whether the distinction between symptom relief and cure has the same relevance to lay people as it does to medical professionals. DESIGN OF STUDY: Small pilot study using qualitative techniques.

settingVariety sample of 11 patients attending the National Health Service walk-in centre, Birmingham, England.

methodIn-depth semi-structured interviews, including pile-sorting and fictional case histories, were used to explore participants' beliefs about the effects of over-the-counter medicines on coughs and colds.

resultsEight of the 11 participants believed that at least one over the-counter cough medicine (most frequently Benylin for Chesty Coughs) could shorten, or "cure", an illness. Five participants thought that the majority of the medicines that they recognised would speed recovery rather than just relieve symptoms.

conclusionsThere is a common confusion in the lay person's mind between the ability of a medicine to relieve symptoms, and its ability to cure a disease or to hasten recovery. This misunderstanding may affect the demand for primary care consultations.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdultAgedCommon ColdCoughFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNonprescription DrugsPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsSelf MedicationTreatment OutcomeNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID14965387
PMCPMC1314801
OpenAlexW54786565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.