ArticleJournal of virology2004
Analysis of the 3' cis-acting elements of rubella virus by using replicons expressing a puromycin resistance gene.
Article in Journal of virology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exogenous Rubella Virus Capsid Proteins Enhance Virus Genome Replication.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Analysis of the selective advantage conferred by a C-E1 fusion protein synthesized by rubella virus DI RNAs.Virology · 2007Article
- Analysis of rubella virus capsid protein-mediated enhancement of replicon replication and mutant rescue.Journal of virology · 2006Article
- Rubella virus capsid protein modulates viral genome replication and virus infectivity.Journal of virology · 2004Article
- Cis-acting RNA elements in human and animal plus-strand RNA viruses.Biochimica et biophysica actaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A rubella virus (RUB) replicon, RUBrep/PAC, was constructed and used to map the 3' cis-acting elements (3' CSE) of the RUB genome required for RUB replication. The RUBrep/PAC replicon had the structural protein open reading frame partially replaced by a puromycin acetyltransferase (PAC) gene. Cells transfected with RUBrep/PAC transcripts expressed the PAC gene from the subgenomic RNA, were rendered resistant to puromycin, and thus survived selection with this drug. The relative survival following puromycin selection of cells transfected with transcripts from RUBrep/PAC constructs with mutations in the 3' CSE varied. The 3' region necessary for optimal relative survival consisted of the 3' 305 nucleotides (nt), a region conserved in RUB defective-interfering RNAs, and thus this region constitutes the 3' CSE. Within the 3' CSE, deletions in the approximately 245 nt that overlap the 3' end of the E1 gene resulted in reduced relative survivals, ranging from 20 to <1% of the parental replicon survival level while most mutations within the approximately 60-nt 3' untranslated region (UTR) were lethal. None of the 3' CSE mutations affected in vitro translation of the nonstructural protein open reading frame (which is 5' proximal in the genome and encodes the enzymes involved in virus RNA replication). In cells transfected with replicons with 3' CSE mutations that survived antibiotic selection (i.e., those with mutations in the region of the 3' CSE that overlaps the E1 coding region), the amount of replicon-specific minus-strand RNA was uniform; however, the accumulation of both plus-strand RNA species, genomic and subgenomic, varied widely, indicating that this region of the RUB 3' CSE affects plus-strand RNA accumulation rather than minus-strand RNA synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.