Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14960217›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2003

Multifaceted support to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a nationwide, controlled trial in general practice.

Bernardd Frijling, Marlies E J L Hulscher, Lilian A T M van Leest, Jozé C C Braspenning, Henk van den Hoogen, Antonius J M Drenthen, Richard P T M Grol

Abstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Multidisciplinary structured lifestyle intervention reduces the estimated risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bernardd FrijlingDutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marlies E J L Hulscher
Lilian A T M van Leest
Jozé C C Braspenning
Henk van den Hoogen
Antonius J M Drenthen
Richard P T M Grol

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultifaceted interventions improve the quality of preventive cardiovascular care in general practice when applied in small-scale research trials.

aimTo test the transferability of observations from research trials on preventive cardiovascular care to a real-world situation and, therefore, evaluate the effectiveness of a nationwide project with a large number of practices. The intervention comprised a combination of conferences, dissemination of manuals, and support from trained non-physicians during outreach visits. DESIGN OF STUDY: A controlled before-and-after trial with two arms: multifaceted support versus no special attention. Analysis after 2 years.

setting617 general practices in The Netherlands.

methodOutcomes measures were the compliance rates for 15 indicators. Structure-of-care indicators included the use of reminders, specific computer files, written protocols, and special clinics. Process-of-care indicators included the assessment of modifiable risk factors and use of a minimal contact intervention (MCI) for smoking cessation. Compliance of general practitioners (GPs) was assessed using self-administered questionnaires.

resultsThe intervention group improved on all eight of the structure-of-care indicators when compared to the control group. A positive effect was also found on the extent to which the GPs measured blood pressure in 60-year-old patients and on the use of an MCI for smoking cessation. No effect was found on the completeness of the risk-factor profiles that the GPs assessed in specific groups of high-risk patients.

conclusionThe nationwide intervention appeared to improve certain aspects of preventive cardiovascular care. Nevertheless, the National Association of GPs decided to stop the project. This decision was made within the context of discussions about the heavy workloads and insufficient incomes being experienced by GPs.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareCardiovascular DiseasesDiffusion of InnovationFamily PracticeFeasibility StudiesGuideline AdherenceHealth PromotionHumansNetherlandsPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID14960217
PMCPMC1314746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.