Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1493028›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1992

Rule of halves: implications of increasing diagnosis and reducing dropout for future workload and prescribing costs in primary care.

J T Hart

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02531776 (Patient Experiences With Injection Needles), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02531776 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Patient Experiences With Injection Needles

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2014 to 2015Enrolled30ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsSubcutaneous insertions of needles
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Shared decision making in consultations for hypertension: Qualitative study in general practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J T HartDepartment of General Practice, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence from one practice and from the literature suggest that approximately half of most common chronic disorders are undetected, that half of those detected are not treated, and that half of those treated are not controlled: the 'rule of halves'. Workload in primary care would increase by at least 12% if all common and important chronic disorders were fully diagnosed, treated and followed up; the accompanying effects on prescribing costs would be complex, but not necessarily inflationary. The relationship between these data and the new general practitioner contract is discussed.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceWorkloadAdultChronic DiseaseDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Management, MedicalPrimary Health CareUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID1493028
PMCPMC1371996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.