ReviewPharmacoEconomics2004
Cost-of-illness studies in diabetes mellitus.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 200 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnitude, risk factors and economic impacts of diabetic emergencies in developing countries: A systematic review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Costs and its drivers for diabetes mellitus type 2 patients in France and Germany: a systematic review of economic studies.BMC health services research · 2020Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of the Economic Burden of Type 2 Diabetes in Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- The impact of diabetes on labour market participation: a systematic review of results and methods.BMC public health · 2019Pooled it
- The costs of diabetes treatment in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMJ global health · 2019Pooled it
- Cost-of-illness of type 2 diabetes mellitus in low and lower-middle income countries: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2018Pooled it
- Cost of diabetes mellitus in Africa: a systematic review of existing literature.Globalization and health · 2018Pooled it
- The Economic Costs of Type 2 Diabetes: A Global Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2015Pooled it
- Population attributable fraction of type 2 diabetes due to physical inactivity in adults: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2014Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of automated telephone self-management support with nurse care management among patients with diabetes.Annals of family medicineTrial
- Attributable one-year healthcare cost of incident type 2 diabetes: A population-wide difference-in-differences study in Denmark.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Article
- Cost-of-illness study among patients with diabetes mellitus and coping mechanisms in Northern Ghana.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- The Economic Burden of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Pakistan: A Cost of Illness Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Health system costs of providing outpatient care for diabetes in people with TB in the Philippines.IJTLD open · 2024Article
- A study of the relationship between social support, depression, alexithymia and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a structural equation modeling approach.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Artificial sweeteners and their implications in diabetes: a review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
- A systematic review of the economic burden of diabetes mellitus: contrasting perspectives from high and low middle-income countries.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Review
- A Systematic Review of the Economic Burden of Diabetes in Eastern Mediterranean Region Countries.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Review
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several cost-of-illness (COI) studies related to diabetes mellitus have been performed over the last three decades. This review examines the results of these COI studies, identifies the strengths and limitations of the various methods utilised, and suggests future research that will help determine the economic burden of diabetes more accurately. Diabetes imposes a large economic burden on society. The economic cost of diabetes is estimated to be as much as dollars US 100 billion per year in the US alone (1997 values). This estimated cost has increased notably over time, primarily due to price inflation and the increasing prevalence of diabetes. Differing methodologies have significantly influenced the cost estimates and made comparisons between COI studies problematic. For example, early reports tended to rely exclusively on data where diabetes was listed as the primary diagnosis or reason for healthcare use. To better capture the costs associated with diabetes-related complications, later studies have included costs related to diabetes as a secondary or tertiary diagnosis using the attributable risk methodology. Given the types of long-term complications that are associated with diabetes, attempts at capturing these secondary costs are appropriate. However, estimates of attributable risk can be limited by the epidemiological data currently available. The tremendous economic burden of diabetes makes the disease an important clinical and public health problem. In order to formulate an effective response to this problem, it is important to track future economic trends as healthcare delivery, morbidity and mortality patterns evolve. Future research efforts should focus on refining methods to estimate costs, improving the interpretation of study findings, and facilitating comparisons between studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.