Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14871155›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2004

Clinical pharmacokinetics of amfetamine and related substances: monitoring in conventional and non-conventional matrices.

Rafael de la Torre, Magí Farré, Mónica Navarro, Roberta Pacifici, Piergiorgio Zuccaro, Simona Pichini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpretation of oral fluid tests for drugs of abuse.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2007
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Excretion of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in sweat.Forensic science international · 2008
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafael de la TorrePharmacology Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica, Barcelona, Spain.
Magí Farré
Mónica Navarro
Roberta Pacifici
Piergiorgio Zuccaro
Simona Pichini
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITMunicipal Institute for Medical Research · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumption of amfetamine-type stimulants, including classical amfetamines and 'designer drugs', has been recognised as one of the most significant trends in drug abuse at the end of the past century and at the beginning of the current one. The first cause is the increasing consumption amongst youth of methylenedioxy- and methoxy-substituted amfetamines, of which the pharmacology in humans is currently under investigation. Secondly, the abuse of more classical amfetamines, such as amfetamine itself and metamfetamine, continues to be highly prevalent in some geographical regions. Amfetamines are powerful psychostimulants, producing increased alertness, wakefulness, insomnia, energy and self-confidence in association with decreased fatigue and appetite as well as enhanced mood, well-being and euphoria. From a clinical pharmacokinetic perspective, amfetamine-type stimulants are rather homogeneous. Their oral bioavailability is good, with a high distribution volume (4 L/kg) and low binding to plasma proteins (less than 20%). The elimination half-life is 6-12 hours. Both hepatic and renal clearance contribute to their elimination from the body. Hepatic metabolism is extensive in most cases, but a significant percentage of the drug always remains unaltered. Amfetamine and related compounds are weak bases, with a pKa around 9.9, and a relatively low molecular weight. These characteristics allow amfetamine-type stimulants to diffuse easily across cell membranes and lipid layers and to those tissues or biological substrates with a more acidic pH than blood, facilitating their detection in alternative matrices at relatively high concentrations. In most cases, the concentrations found are higher than expected from the Henderson-Hasselbach equation. Drug monitoring in non-conventional biological matrices (e.g. saliva, hair, nails, sweat) has recently gained much attention because of its possible applications in clinical and forensic toxicology. An individual's past history of medication, compliance or drug abuse can be obtained from testing of hair and nails, whereas data on current status of drug use can be provided by analysis of sweat and saliva. Because of the physicochemical properties of amfetamine-type stimulants, this group of drugs is one of the most suitable for drug testing in non-conventional matrices.

Indexed as

AmphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsDesigner DrugsDrug InteractionsDrug MonitoringHumansN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineSubstance Abuse DetectionAmphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsDesigner DrugsN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID14871155
OpenAlexW2024371333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.