Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1486138›Full record

ArticleBiological cybernetics1992

Control of rabbit nictitating membrane movements. I. A computer model of the retractor bulbi muscle and the associated orbital mechanics.

G T Bartha, R F Thompson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological cybernetics, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G T BarthaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, CA 94305-2130.
R F Thompson
Stanford University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective in this study is to synthesize existing experimental data by constructing a realistic neuromechanical control model of rabbit nictitating membrane (NM) movements. We model the retractor bulbi muscle at the motor unit level because this is the level of nervous system control and also facilitates comparison with experimental data. Our motor unit model is derived from an earlier model of muscle activation based on calcium kinetics and includes a post-activation potentiation mechanism. Motor units are combined into a model of whole muscle that includes length-tension and force-velocity effects. Finally, we incorporate the muscle model into a biomechanical model in which the globe and NM are represented as a system of inertial, viscous, and elastic elements. The model takes patterns of neural signals (in the form of impulses) as input and produces movement of the NM as output. Our muscle model quantitatively accounts for data on isometric force development and decay for twitch, double shock, and tetanic stimulation. The complete model may be used for analysis of the relationship of motoneuron activity to behavior or as a realistic response generator in models of NM conditioning. This study also highlights gaps in the experimental data on the rabbit NM effector system.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaElasticityIsometric ContractionMathematicsMusclesNictitating MembraneOculomotor MusclesRabbitsViscosity

Identifiers

PMID1486138
OpenAlexW2324528174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.