ArticleBiological cybernetics1992
Control of rabbit nictitating membrane movements. I. A computer model of the retractor bulbi muscle and the associated orbital mechanics.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- An agonist-antagonist cerebellar nuclear system controlling eyelid kinematics during motor learning.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2012Article
- Recruitment in retractor bulbi muscle during eyeblink conditioning: EMG analysis and common-drive model.Journal of neurophysiology · 2009Article
- Metabotropic glutamate receptor activation in cerebellar Purkinje cells as substrate for adaptive timing of the classically conditioned eye-blink response.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1996Article
- Control of rabbit nictitating membrane movements. II. Analysis of the relation of motoneuron activity to behavior.Biological cybernetics · 1992Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our objective in this study is to synthesize existing experimental data by constructing a realistic neuromechanical control model of rabbit nictitating membrane (NM) movements. We model the retractor bulbi muscle at the motor unit level because this is the level of nervous system control and also facilitates comparison with experimental data. Our motor unit model is derived from an earlier model of muscle activation based on calcium kinetics and includes a post-activation potentiation mechanism. Motor units are combined into a model of whole muscle that includes length-tension and force-velocity effects. Finally, we incorporate the muscle model into a biomechanical model in which the globe and NM are represented as a system of inertial, viscous, and elastic elements. The model takes patterns of neural signals (in the form of impulses) as input and produces movement of the NM as output. Our muscle model quantitatively accounts for data on isometric force development and decay for twitch, double shock, and tetanic stimulation. The complete model may be used for analysis of the relationship of motoneuron activity to behavior or as a realistic response generator in models of NM conditioning. This study also highlights gaps in the experimental data on the rabbit NM effector system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.