Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1478380›Full record

ReviewDiabetologia1992

Treatment of diabetes mellitus.

R P Robertson, D J Klein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetologia, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R P RobertsonDiabetes Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
D J Klein
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New treatment strategies for subjects with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) and Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus are being developed. Pilot studies utilising insulin itself have been reported to prevent Type 1 diabetes in subjects likely, by immunogenetic and physiologic criteria, to develop clinically overt disease, while the results of nicoti-namide trials in these subjects remain preliminary. Immunotherapy with cyclosporin A and azathioprine can slow disease progression and may produce long-term remissions when given within two months of onset of clinically overt disease. In subjects with established disease, familial clustering of diabetic nephropathy may be related to concomitant susceptibility to hypertension and elevated rates of Na/H countertransport. Treatment of hypertension associated with the nephropathy appears to slow renal deterioration. Whether reversal of the metabolic consequences of insulin deficiency or resistance also prevents chronic diabetic complications has not been firmly established. In the presence of a reduced Beta-cell mass, moderate hyperglycaemia may itself contribute to decreased muscle glucose uptake but not glycogen synthesis in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Reversal of chronic hyperglycaemia by pancreas and islet cell transplantation, vanadate, and sulphonylureas are discussed as alternate strategies to insulin treatment in establishing normoglycaemia and furthering our understanding of insulin action and secretion at the cellular level. There remains a need to develop more sensitive biochemical and genetic markers to identify subjects at increased risk for developing chronic diabetic complications.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntihypertensive AgentsDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesHumansInsulinIslets of Langerhans TransplantationPancreas TransplantationRatsRats, Inbred SHRRisk FactorsVanadatesAntihypertensive AgentsInsulinVanadates

Identifiers

PMID1478380
OpenAlexW3146449700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.