Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14769859›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2004

Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast.

Emily S Gillett, Christopher W Espelin, Peter K Sorger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Progress in the Study of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint in Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spindle assembly checkpoint activation and silencing at kinetochores.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Bub1 kinase in the regulation of mitosis.Animal cells and systems · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily S GillettMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Biology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., 68-371 Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Christopher W Espelin
Peter K Sorger
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

BIOCHEMICAL AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF YEAST KINETOCHORESR01GM051464 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SORGER, PETER KARL · 1994 to 2010
$3.9M
CELL AND TUMOR GENETICS OF MITOTIC ARREST CHECKPOINTSR01CA084179 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SORGER, PETER KARL · 2000 to 2010
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA84179NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084179NIGMS NIH HHS GM51464NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM051464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on precise regulation of mitosis by the spindle checkpoint. This checkpoint monitors the status of kinetochore-microtubule attachment and delays the metaphase to anaphase transition until all kinetochores have formed stable bipolar connections to the mitotic spindle. Components of the spindle checkpoint include the mitotic arrest defective (MAD) genes MAD1-3, and the budding uninhibited by benzimidazole (BUB) genes BUB1 and BUB3. In animal cells, all known spindle checkpoint proteins are recruited to kinetochores during normal mitoses. In contrast, we show that whereas Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bub1p and Bub3p are bound to kinetochores early in mitosis as part of the normal cell cycle, Mad1p and Mad2p are kinetochore bound only in the presence of spindle damage or kinetochore lesions that interfere with chromosome-microtubule attachment. Moreover, although Mad1p and Mad2p perform essential mitotic functions during every division cycle in mammalian cells, they are required in budding yeast only when mitosis goes awry. We propose that differences in the behavior of spindle checkpoint proteins in animal cells and budding yeast result primarily from evolutionary divergence in spindle assembly pathways.

Indexed as

AnimalsAurora KinasesCarrier ProteinsCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsChromosome SegregationChromosomes, FungalGenes, cdcIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKinetochoresMacromolecular SubstancesMad2 ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsAurora KinasesBub1 spindle checkpoint proteinBUB2 protein, S cerevisiaeCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDAM1 protein, S cerevisiaeIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsIPL1 protein, S cerevisiaeMacromolecular SubstancesMAD1 protein, S cerevisiaeMad2 ProteinsMAD2 protein, S cerevisiaeMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSTU2 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID14769859
PMCPMC2171994
OpenAlexW2082708594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.