Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14768663›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied behavior analysis2003

Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research.

Eric S Murphy, Frances K McSweeney, Richard G Smith, Jennifer J McComas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The cardiovascular and endocrine responses to voluntary and forced diving in trained and untrained rats.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Further evaluation of methods to identify matched stimulation.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2007
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric S MurphyDepartment of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, 99508, USA. afesm@uaa.alaska.edu
Frances K McSweeney
Richard G Smith
Jennifer J McComas

Funding

CHANGES IN REINFORCER VALUE AND REINFORCER RELATIVITYR01MH061720 · NIMH · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCSWEENEY, FRANCES K · 2000 to 2002
$313k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH 61720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reinforcers lose their effectiveness when they are presented repeatedly. Traditionally, this loss of effectiveness has been labeled satiation. However, recent evidence suggests that habituation provides a more accurate and useful description. The characteristics of behavior undergoing satiation differ for different stimuli (e.g., food, water), and these characteristics have not been identified for the noningestive reinforcers often used by applied behavior analysts (e.g., praise, attention). As a result, the term satiation provides little guidance for either maintaining or reducing the effectiveness of reinforcers. In contrast, the characteristics of behavior undergoing habituation are well known and are relatively general across species and stimuli. These characteristics provide specific and novel guidance about how to maintain or reduce the effectiveness of a reinforcer. In addition, habituation may lead to a better understanding of several puzzling phenomena in the conditioning literature (e.g., extinction, behavioral contrast), and it may provide a more precise and accurate description of the dynamics of many different types of behavior.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologySatiationAnimalsBehavior TherapyHabituation, PsychophysiologicHumansMotivationPsychology, AppliedResearchToken EconomyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID14768663
PMCPMC1284459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.