Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14762059›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

Comparative genomics of gene expression in the parasitic and free-living nematodes Strongyloides stercoralis and Caenorhabditis elegans.

Makedonka Mitreva, James P McCarter, John Martin, Mike Dante, Todd Wylie, Brandi Chiapelli, Deana Pape, Sandra W Clifton, Thomas B Nutman, Robert H Waterston

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anthelmintic potency ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pan-phylum Comparison of Nematode Metabolic Potential.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Makedonka MitrevaDepartment of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA. mmitreva@watson.wstl.edu
James P McCarter
John Martin
Mike Dante
Todd Wylie
Brandi Chiapelli
Deana Pape
Sandra W Clifton
Thomas B Nutman
Robert H Waterston
Washington University in St. Louis · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

A GENOMIC APPROACH TO PARASITES FROM THE PHYLUM NEMATODAU01AI046593 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MITREVA, MAKEDONKA · 2000 to 2007
$4.0M
Molecular ID Of Filarial/Nonfilarial Genes/ProteinsZ01AI000512 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI NUTMAN, THOMAS B · 1988 to 2008
$324k
NIAID NIH HHS AI46593NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI046593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although developmental timing of gene expression is used to infer potential gene function, studies have yet to correlate this information between species. We analyzed 10,921 ESTs in 3311 clusters from first- and infective third-stage larva (L1, L3i) of the parasitic nematode Strongyloides stercoralis and compared the results to Caenorhabditis elegans, a species that has an L3i-like dauer stage. In the comparison of S. stercoralis clusters with stage-specific expression to C. elegans homologs expressed in either dauer or nondauer stages, matches between S. stercoralis L1 and C. elegans nondauer-expressed genes dominated, suggesting conservation in the repertoire of genes expressed during growth in nutrient-rich conditions. For example, S. stercoralis collagen transcripts were abundant in L1 but not L3i, a pattern consistent with C. elegans collagens. Although a greater proportion of S. stercoralis L3i than L1 genes have homologs among the C. elegans dauer-specific transcripts, we did not uncover evidence of a robust conserved L3i/dauer 'expression signature.' Strikingly, in comparisons of S. stercoralis clusters to C. elegans homologs with RNAi knockouts, those with significant L1-specific expression were more than twice as likely as L3i-specific clusters to match genes with phenotypes. We also provide functional classifications of S. stercoralis clusters.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCloning, MolecularCluster AnalysisCulture MediaDNA, HelminthGene Expression ProfilingGenes, HelminthGenomicsMolecular Sequence DataOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypeRNA, HelminthRNA InterferenceSequence Analysis, DNASequence Homology, Nucleic AcidCulture MediaDNA, HelminthRNA, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID14762059
PMCPMC327096
OpenAlexW2148917681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.