Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14760772›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2004

Utility of serum CA19-9 in diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma: in comparison with CEA.

Xing-Lei Qin, Zhuo-Ren Wang, Jing-Sen Shi, Min Lu, Lin Wang, Quan-Ru He

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum CA19-9 in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xing-Lei QinDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China. qinxinglei@yahoo.com.cn
Zhuo-Ren Wang
Jing-Sen Shi
Min Lu
Lin Wang
Quan-Ru He
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNFirst Hospital of Xi'an · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma is often difficult, making management approaches problematic. A reliable serum marker for cholangiocarcinoma would be a useful diagnostic test. The aims of our study were to evaluate the usefulness of a serum CA19-9 determination in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

methodsWe prospectively measured serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (n=35), benign biliary diseases (n=92), and healthy individuals (n=15). Serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations were measured by an immunoradiometric assay without knowledge of the clinical diagnosis.

resultsThe sensitivity of a CA19-9 value >37 KU/L(-1) and a CEA value >22 microg/L(-1) in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma were 77.14% and 68.57%, respectively. When compared with the benign biliary diseases group, the true negative rates of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 84.78% and 81.52%, respectively. The false positive rates of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 15.22% and 18.48%, whereas the accuracy of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 82.68% and 77.95%, respectively. Serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations were significantly elevated (P<0.001 and P<0.05) in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (290.31+/-5.34 KU/L(-1) and 36.46+/-18.03 microg/L(-1)) compared with patients with benign biliary diseases (13.38+/-2.59 KU/L(-1) and 13.84+/-3.85 microg/L(-1)) and healthy individuals (12.78+/-3.69 KU/L(-1) and 11.48+/-3.37 microg/L(-1)). In 15 patients undergoing curative resection of cholangiocarcinoma, the mean serum CA19-9 concentration was decreased from a preoperative level of 286.41+/-4.36 KU/L(-1) to a postoperative level of 62.01+/-17.43 KU/L(-1) (P<0.001), and the mean serum CEA concentration from 39.41+/-24.35 microg/L(-1) to 28.69+/-11.03 microg/L(-1) (P<0.05). In patients with cholangiocarcinoma, however, no correlation was found between serum CEA and CA19-9 concentrations (r=0.036).

conclusionThese data suggest that the serum CA19-9 determination is a useful addition to the available tests for the differential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. Serum CA19-9 is an effective tumor marker in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma, deciding whether the tumor has been radically resected and monitoring effect of treatment.

Indexed as

Bile Ducts, IntrahepaticBile Duct NeoplasmsCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCholangiocarcinomaHumansCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic Antigen

Identifiers

PMID14760772
PMCPMC4724921
OpenAlexW2135972280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.