Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2004
Patient satisfaction with two different models of cancer genetic services in south-east Scotland.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current Genetic Service Delivery Models for the Provision of Genetic Testing in Europe: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Pooled it
- Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.Journal of genetic counseling · 2007Trial
- Familial breast cancer: management of 'lower risk' referrals.British journal of cancer · 2006Trial
- Genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. Evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials.British journal of cancer · 2006Trial
- Patient Satisfaction with Private Genetic Counselling for Familial Cancer in Western Australia: A Prospective Audit.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Valuing Preferences for the Process and Outcomes of Clinical Genetics Services: A Pilot Study.The patient · 2016Article
- Article
- What information do cancer genetic counselees prioritize?Journal of genetic counseling · 2012Article
- Breast cancer genetic counselling referrals: how comparable are the findings between the UK and the Netherlands?Journal of community genetics · 2011Article
- "I wouldn't classify myself as a patient": the importance of a "well-being" environment for individuals receiving counseling about familial cancer risk.Journal of genetic counseling · 2008Article
- Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.Journal of genetic counseling · 2007Article
- Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees' post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment.Journal of genetic counseling · 2007Article
- Nurse-led cancer genetics clinics in primary and secondary care in varied ethnic population areas: interaction with primary care to improve ascertainment of individuals from ethnic minorities.Familial cancer · 2007Article
- Cancer genetics in rural primary care: a pilot nurse-led service using a new mobile IT system.Familial cancer · 2007Article
- A discrete choice experiment of preferences for genetic counselling among Jewish women seeking cancer genetics services.British journal of cancer · 2006Article
- Decision aids for familial breast cancer: exploring women's views using focus groups.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2006Article
- Analysis of referrals to a multi-disciplinary breast cancer genetics clinic: practical and economic considerations.Familial cancer · 2006Article
- Determinants of preferences for genetic counselling in Jewish women.Familial cancer · 2006Article
- Identifying future models for delivering genetic services: a nominal group study in primary care.BMC family practice · 2005Article
- Referrals of patients to colorectal cancer genetics services in south-east Scotland.Familial cancer · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need to integrate primary- and secondary-care cancer genetic services, but the most appropriate model of service delivery remains unclear. This study reports patients' expectations of breast cancer genetic services and a comparison of their satisfaction with two service models. In the first model, risk assessment was carried out using mailed family history data. Women estimated as being at high/moderate risk were offered an appointment at the familial breast cancer clinic, and those at low risk were sent a letter of reassurance. In the second model, all women were seen by a genetic nurse specialist, who assessed risk, referred high/moderate-risk women to the above clinic and discharged those at low risk. Over 60% of all women in the study regarded access to breast screening by mammogram and regular check-ups as very important. This underlines the demand for a multidisciplinary service providing both clinical genetic and surgical services. Satisfaction was high with both models of service, although significantly lower among women not at increased cancer risk and thus not offered a clinical check-up and mammography. Increased cancer worry was associated with a greater expressed need for information and for reassurance through follow-up clinical checks and mammography. Better targeting of counselling to the expressed concerns and needs of these women is required to improve the service offered. GPs and patients expressed no clear preference for any specific service location or staffing configuration. The novel community service was less expensive in terms of both staff and patient costs. The potential to decrease health staff/patient contact time and to employ nurse practitioners with both clinical genetic and oncology training should be explored further. The rapidly rising demand for these services suggests that the evaluation of further new models needs to continue to be given priority to guide the development of cancer genetic services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.