Hospital smoking bans and their impact.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. JUUL on Twitter: Analyzing Tweets About Use of a New Nicotine Delivery System.The Journal of school health · 2020
   Article
2. Let food be thy medicine: linking local food and health systems to address the full spectrum of malnutrition in low-income and middle-income countries.BMJ global health · 2017
   Article
3. Smoking behaviours and cessation services among male physicians in China: evidence from a structural equation model.Tobacco control · 2013
   Article
4. Tobacco control for anesthesiologists.Journal of anesthesia · 2007
   Review
5. Smoking and fire.American journal of public health · 2004
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as