Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14757858›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2004

Comparative genomic hybridisation using a proximal 17p BAC/PAC array detects rearrangements responsible for four genomic disorders.

C J Shaw, C A Shaw, W Yu, P Stankiewicz, L D White, A L Beaudet, J R Lupski

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. IncreasedJournal of medical genetics · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Incidental copy-number variants identified by routine genome testing in a clinical population.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bacterial artificial chromosome-emulation oligonucleotide arrays for targeted clinical array-comparative genomic hybridization analyses.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2008
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. DNA microarrays in herbal drug research.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2006
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Chromosome analysis: what and when to request.Archives of disease in childhood · 2005
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C J ShawDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
C A Shaw
W Yu
P Stankiewicz
L D White
A L Beaudet
J R Lupski
Baylor College of Medicine · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING FXTAS AMONG MALES WITH THE FMR1 PREMUTATIONP30HD024064 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ZOGHBI, HUDA Y · 1988 to 2013
$29.4M
Telomere integrity of de novo terminal deletionsP01HD039420 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LUPSKI, JAMES R. · 2001 to 2005
$4.7M
NICHD NIH HHS HD24064NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD39420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProximal chromosome 17p is a region rich in low copy repeats (LCRs) and prone to chromosomal rearrangements. Four genomic disorders map within the interval 17p11-p12: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A, hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies, Smith-Magenis syndrome, and dup(17)(p11.2p11.2) syndrome. While 80-90% or more of the rearrangements resulting in each disorder are recurrent, several non-recurrent deletions or duplications of varying sizes within proximal 17p also have been characterised using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

methodsA BAC/PAC array based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH) method was tested for its ability to detect these genomic dosage differences and map breakpoints in 25 patients with recurrent and non-recurrent rearrangements.

resultsArray-CGH detected the dosage imbalances resulting from either deletion or duplication in all the samples examined. The array-CGH approach, in combination with a dependent statistical inference method, mapped 45/46 (97.8%) of the analysed breakpoints to within one overlapping BAC/PAC clone, compared with determinations done independently by FISH. Several clones within the array that contained large LCRs did not have an adverse effect on the interpretation of the array-CGH data.

conclusionsArray-CGH is an accurate and sensitive method for detecting genomic dosage differences and identifying rearrangement breakpoints, even in LCR-rich regions of the genome.

Indexed as

CentromereChromosome BreakageChromosome DeletionChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, Artificial, P1 BacteriophageChromosomes, Human, Pair 17DNAElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldFemaleGene DuplicationGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMutationDNA

Identifiers

PMID14757858
PMCPMC1735660
OpenAlexW2106559752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.