Academic medicine: resuscitation in progress.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Patient Complexity, Social Factors, and Hospitalization Outcomes at Academic and Community Hospitals.JAMA network open · 2025
   Article
2. Determinants of research engagement in academic obstetrics and gynaecology.BMC medical education · 2016
   Article
3. Five futures for academic medicine: the ICRAM scenarios.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
   Review
4. Who cares about academic medicine?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004
   Article
5. Campaign to revitalise academic medicine kicks off.Paediatrics & child health · 2004
   Article
6. Campaign to revitalise academic medicine kicks off.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as