Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14755251›Full record

ArticleOncogene2004

The ATR-p53 pathway is suppressed in noncycling normal and malignant lymphocytes.

Gillian G Jones, Philip M Reaper, Andrew R Pettitt, Paul D Sherrington

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phase I Study of ATR Inhibitor M6620 in Combination With Topotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetic diversity and population structure of the endangered marsupial Sarcophilus harrisii (Tasmanian devil).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gillian G JonesDepartment of Haematology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK.
Philip M Reaper
Andrew R Pettitt
Paul D Sherrington
University of Liverpool · GBRoyal Liverpool University Hospital · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) results from the accumulation of apoptosis-resistant clonal B cells that are arrested in G0/G1, and is heterogeneous with respect to clinical outcome. An aggressive form of the disease is identified by an impaired p53 response to ionizing radiation (IR). This is associated with inactivating mutations of either p53 or ATM, a regulator of p53 activated by IR-induced DNA damage. Since other forms of DNA damage activate p53 via ATR, a kinase closely related to ATM, abnormalities of the ATR-p53 pathway also have the potential to result in p53 dysfunction. We therefore tested cases of CLL for abnormal p53 responses to ultraviolet irradiation (UVC), a known activator of ATR, to screen for additional forms of p53 dysfunction. CLL cells and normal peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) preparations (predominantly noncycling lymphocytes) were treated with UVC and assessed for p53 responses. In all of the CLL cases and PBMC preparations tested, we were unable to detect p53 accumulation, phosphorylation or transcriptional consequences in response to UVC-induced DNA damage. The most likely explanation for the absence of UVC-induced p53 activation in CLL and normal lymphocytes was that, in contrast to other cell types, the UVC-induced ATR pathway was inactive. This notion was confirmed by showing that ATR protein was absent or undetectable in all of the cases of CLL and normal PBMCs screened. This was an unexpected finding because ATR was thought to be essential for the viability of somatic cells and for normal human and murine embryonic development. An obvious difference between the cell lines used as positive controls for ATR antibodies and the CLL cells/PBMCs was that the former were actively cycling while the latter were quiescent. We therefore hypothesized that the ATR-p53 pathway is selectively downregulated in noncycling lymphocytes. To test this, we induced cycling in the T-cell fraction of PBMC preparations and demonstrated that ATR protein expression was restored. Furthermore, p53 was upregulated and phosphorylated in response to UVC in these cells. Our data support the conclusion that the ATR-p53 pathway is suppressed in noncycling lymphocytes via ATR downregulation. We tentatively suggest that this repressed DNA damage response may have evolved to protect quiescent lymphocytes from the potential for p53-dependent apoptosis in the face of some forms of endurable genotoxic stress. If this is the case, DNA repair and genome stability might be compromised in quiescent lymphocytes with potentially negative consequences.

Indexed as

Base SequenceCell CycleCells, CulturedDNA DamageDNA, NeoplasmDNA PrimersHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellLymphocytesMitosisReference ValuesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTumor Cells, CulturedTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ultraviolet RaysDNA, NeoplasmDNA PrimersTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID14755251
OpenAlexW2002480651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.