Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14754575›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health perspectives2004

Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane burden and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of the epidemiologic evidence.

Malaquías López-Cervantes, Luisa Torres-Sánchez, Aurelio Tobías, Lizbeth López-Carrillo

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health perspectives, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Body concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. DDT/DDE and breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Epidemiology beyond its limits.Science advances · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. In utero DDT exposure and breast density before age 50.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. When Is Enough, Enough? When Are More Observational Epidemiologic Studies Needed to Resolve a Research Question: Illustrations Using Biomarker-Cancer Associations.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malaquías López-CervantesMexico National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Luisa Torres-Sánchez
Aurelio Tobías
Lizbeth López-Carrillo
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) exposure and breast cancer risk has received increasing attention since the beginning of the 1990s. Contradicting published results regarding the relationship between body burden levels of p,p'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (p,p'-DDE)--the main DDT metabolite--and breast cancer, we argue that such differences stem from methodologic differences among those studies. We performed a meta-analysis of 22 articles using DerSimonian and Laird's method for random effects models. The Q-statistic was used to identify heterogeneity in the outcome variable across studies. The gradient of p,p'-DDE exposure in epidemiologic studies was homogenized to serum lipid bases (nanograms per gram). The potential for publication bias was examined by means of the Begg's test. We discuss methodologic features of the studies in an attempt to reconcile the findings. The summary odds ratio (OR) for selected studies was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.09) and the gradient of exposure ranged from 84.37 to 12,948 ng/g. No overall heterogeneity in the OR was observed (chi-squared = 27.93; df = 23; p = 0.218). Neither the study design nor the lack of breast-feeding control or the type of biologic specimen used to measure p,p'-DDE levels were the causes of heterogeneity throughout the studies. Evidence for publication bias was not found (p = 0.253). Overall, these results should be regarded as a strong evidence to discard the putative relationship between p,p'-DDE and breast cancer risk. Nevertheless, the exposure to DDT during critical periods of human development--from conception to adolescence--and individual variations in metabolizing enzymes of DDT or its derivatives are still important areas to be researched in regard to breast cancer development in adulthood.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposurePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicDDTDichlorodiphenyl DichloroethyleneEnvironmental PollutantsEpidemiologic StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornDDTDichlorodiphenyl DichloroethyleneEnvironmental PollutantsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID14754575
PMCPMC1241830
OpenAlexW2092818618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.