Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14754569›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2004

Potential exposure to PCBs, DDT, and PBDEs from sport-caught fish consumption in relation to breast cancer risk in Wisconsin.

Jane A McElroy, Marty S Kanarek, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Stephanie A Robert, John M Hampton, Polly A Newcomb, Henry A Anderson, Patrick L Remington

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Scientific Opinion on Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) in Food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2011
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jane A McElroyUniversity of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, 53726, USA. jamcelroy@wisc.edu
Marty S Kanarek
Amy Trentham-Dietz
Stephanie A Robert
John M Hampton
Polly A Newcomb
Henry A Anderson
Patrick L Remington
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USGaylord Hospital · USWisconsin Department of Health Services · US

Funding

PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, LIFESTYLE AND OVARIAN CANCER RISKR01CA047147 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 1988 to 2007
$2.6M
REGIONAL VARIATION OF BREAST CANCER RATES IN WISCONSINU01CA082004 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI REMINGTON, PATRICK L · 1999 to 2002
$970k
NCI NIH HHS R01CA47147NCI NIH HHS U01CA82004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Wisconsin, consumption of Great Lakes fish is an important source of exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and other halogenated hydrocarbons, all of which may act as potential risk factors for breast cancer. We examined the association between sport-caught fish consumption and breast cancer incidence as part of an ongoing population-based case-control study. We identified breast cancer cases 20-69 years of age who were diagnosed in 1998-2000 (n = 1,481) from the Wisconsin Cancer Reporting System. Female controls of similar age were randomly selected from population lists (n = 1,301). Information about all sport-caught (Great Lakes and other lakes) fish consumption and breast cancer risk factors was obtained through telephone interviews. After adjustment for known and suspected risk factors, the relative risk of breast cancer for women who had recently consumed sport-caught fish was similar to women who had never eaten sport-caught fish [relative risk (RR) = 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-1.17]. Frequency of consumption and location of sport-caught fish were not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Recent consumption of Great Lakes fish was not associated with postmenopausal breast cancer (RR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57-1.07), whereas risk associated with premenopausal breast cancer was elevated (RR = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.16-2.50). In this study we found no overall association between recent consumption of sport-caught fish and breast cancer, although there may be an increased breast cancer risk for subgroups of women who are young and/or premenopausal.

Indexed as

FishesFood ContaminationAdultAgedAge FactorsAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDDTDietEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleGreat Lakes RegionHumansIncidenceInsecticidesDDTEnvironmental PollutantsInsecticidesPolychlorinated BiphenylsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID14754569
PMCPMC1241824
OpenAlexW1996765029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.