ArticleDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2004
[Internet and occupational dermatology. Quality criteria and useful links].
Article in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The World Wide Web (WWW) offers physicians as well as their patients a huge resource of health information, which can be attained within minutes. Nevertheless it is difficult to select the needed information out of the mass of provided data and their quality is often poor with many unproven statements. Occupational dermatologists can especially benefit from the internet as they need a wide range of data from many sources. Much of this data can already be obtained via internet. To facilitate their search for information, this article presents a selection of German websites. The quality of the websites has been assessed using criteria such as design, search function, provided links and medical information. The results revealed deficiencies in the transparency of the data, e.g. often it is not apparent who is responsible for the information or when they were updated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14749861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.