Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14745539›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2003

Evolutionary history and mode of the amylase multigene family in Drosophila.

Ze Zhang, Nobuyuki Inomata, Tsuneyuki Yamazaki, Hirohisa Kishino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ze ZhangLaboratory of Biometrics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan. zzhang@lbm.ab.a.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Nobuyuki Inomata
Tsuneyuki Yamazaki
Hirohisa Kishino

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that the tandemly repeated members of the amylase (Amy) gene family evolved in a concerted manner in the melanogaster subgroup and in some other species. In this paper, we analyzed all of the 49 active and complete Amy gene sequences in Drosophila, mostly from subgenus Sophophora. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the two types of diverged Amy genes in the Drosophila montium subgroup and Drosophila ananassae, which are located in distant chromosomal regions from each other, originated independently in different evolutionary lineages of the melanogaster group after the split of the obscura and melanogaster groups. One of the two clusters was lost after duplication in the melanogaster subgroup. Given the time, 24.9 mya, of divergence between the obscura and the melanogaster groups (Russo et al. 1995), the two duplication events were estimated to occur at about 13.96 +/- 1.93 and 12.38 +/- 1.76 mya in the montium subgroup and D. ananassae, respectively. An accelerated rate of amino acid changes was not observed in either lineage after these gene duplications. However, the G+C contents at the third codon positions (GC3) decreased significantly along one of the two Amy clusters both in the montium subgroup and in D. ananassae right after gene duplication. Furthermore, one of the two types of the Amy genes with a lower GC3 content has lost a specific regulatory element within the montium subgroup species and D. ananassae. While the tandemly repeated members evolved in a concerted manner, the two types of diverged Amy genes in Drosophila experienced frequent gene duplication, gene loss, and divergent evolution following the model of a birth-and-death process.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmylasesAnimalsDrosophilaGene DeletionGene DuplicationModels, GeneticMultigene FamilyPhylogenyAmylases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.