ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2003
Evolutionary history and mode of the amylase multigene family in Drosophila.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host Transcriptome Analysis ofInsects · 2023Article
- Anatomy and Physiology of the Digestive Tract ofGenetics · 2018Review
- Evolutionary history of eukaryotic α-glucosidases from the α-amylase family.Journal of molecular evolution · 2013Article
- The 5S rDNA family evolves through concerted and birth-and-death evolution in fish genomes: an example from freshwater stingrays.BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
- Article
- Characterization of maltase clusters in the genus Drosophila.Journal of molecular evolution · 2011Article
- Comparative genomics reveals a constant rate of origination and convergent acquisition of functional retrogenes in Drosophila.Genome biology · 2007Article
- Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families.Annual review of genetics · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies indicate that the tandemly repeated members of the amylase (Amy) gene family evolved in a concerted manner in the melanogaster subgroup and in some other species. In this paper, we analyzed all of the 49 active and complete Amy gene sequences in Drosophila, mostly from subgenus Sophophora. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the two types of diverged Amy genes in the Drosophila montium subgroup and Drosophila ananassae, which are located in distant chromosomal regions from each other, originated independently in different evolutionary lineages of the melanogaster group after the split of the obscura and melanogaster groups. One of the two clusters was lost after duplication in the melanogaster subgroup. Given the time, 24.9 mya, of divergence between the obscura and the melanogaster groups (Russo et al. 1995), the two duplication events were estimated to occur at about 13.96 +/- 1.93 and 12.38 +/- 1.76 mya in the montium subgroup and D. ananassae, respectively. An accelerated rate of amino acid changes was not observed in either lineage after these gene duplications. However, the G+C contents at the third codon positions (GC3) decreased significantly along one of the two Amy clusters both in the montium subgroup and in D. ananassae right after gene duplication. Furthermore, one of the two types of the Amy genes with a lower GC3 content has lost a specific regulatory element within the montium subgroup species and D. ananassae. While the tandemly repeated members evolved in a concerted manner, the two types of diverged Amy genes in Drosophila experienced frequent gene duplication, gene loss, and divergent evolution following the model of a birth-and-death process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14745539What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.